🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates NEC Nijmegen at 62% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this NEC Nijmegen vs NAC Breda encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Goffertstadion plays host to NEC Nijmegen versus NAC Breda in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 33. Kick-off: Wednesday 14 May 2025 at 19:00 UTC.

Form

NEC Nijmegen (all games): 3W 3D 4L across 10 Eredivisie fixtures this term — 1.20 PPG. Last five: L W L D W. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

NEC Nijmegen's home record at Goffertstadion: 2W 5D 3L from 10 Eredivisie appearances (1.10 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 100% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

NAC Breda's overall Eredivisie record this term: 0W 6D 4L from 10 games (0.60 PPG). Last five: L D D L L. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Eredivisie this season, NAC Breda have posted 1W 3D 6L from 10 away outings — 0.60 PPG. Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The form ledger tips toward NEC Nijmegen. A 0.60 PPG lead over NAC Breda (1.20 vs 0.60) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — NEC Nijmegen have seen both teams score in 100% of their games, NAC Breda in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: NEC Nijmegen 0W, NAC Breda 1W, 0D.

Historically, goals have been at a premium in this fixture — just 1.0 per game from 1 meetings. The Under 2.5 has a clear base rate from the H2H record alone. The most recent clash, on 5 Oct 2024, ended 0–1 with NAC Breda winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading

NEC Nijmegen half-time and goal-timing data (67 games, 33 at home): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 95% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 73% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 73% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

NAC Breda half-time and goal-timing data (67 games, 33 at away): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 90% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 39%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — NEC Nijmegen 58% and NAC Breda 64% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEC Nijmegen 64% | NAC Breda 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEC Nijmegen 2.19 xG and NAC Breda 1.07 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEC Nijmegen attack 1.150 / defence 1.186 | NAC Breda attack 0.671 / defence 1.189. League average goals — home 1.603 / away 1.342. Data: 66 NEC Nijmegen games / 32 NAC Breda games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEC Nijmegen 62% | Draw 21% | NAC Breda 17%. Fair-value odds: NEC Nijmegen 1.61 | Draw 4.76 | NAC Breda 5.88. The model has a clear lean to NEC Nijmegen (62%) — a 45pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 3.26. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.26 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is NEC Nijmegen at 62% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 21% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.26 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 63% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 59% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: NEC Nijmegen 100% | NAC Breda 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights