🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates NAC Breda at 59%, yet other data sources diverge — this NAC Breda vs Heracles fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

NAC Breda host Heracles at Rat Verlegh Stadion in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 6. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 20 September 2025 at 20:00 UTC.

Form Guide

NAC Breda — All Games: 1W 3D 6L from 10 Eredivisie outings this season, averaging 0.60 points per game. Last five: L W L L D. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. NAC Breda have played only a handful of Eredivisie games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

At home at Rat Verlegh Stadion, NAC Breda have gone 2W 6D 2L this season (10 games, 1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.60 — NAC Breda are significantly better at Rat Verlegh Stadion than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Heracles stand at 1W 0D 9L from 10 Eredivisie matches — 0.30 PPG. Last five: L L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 3.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 3.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Heracles have played only a handful of Eredivisie games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

On the road, Heracles have gone 1W 2D 7L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 0.50 goals scored and 2.50 conceded per game.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — NAC Breda at 0.60 PPG versus Heracles's 0.30. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

H2H

Despite the anticipated home advantage, Heracles have the better historical record — 3 wins from 4 previous contests against 0 for NAC Breda.

The 4 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.2 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 31 Jan 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. Heracles have won 3 of 4 previous encounters, and at 3.2 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

In-Play Profile

NAC Breda in-play tendencies (39 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Heracles in-play tendencies (39 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 70% of the time; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%; they fail to score in 31% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — NAC Breda 56% versus Heracles 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NAC Breda 51% | Heracles 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NAC Breda 1.79 xG and Heracles 0.86 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NAC Breda attack 0.836 / defence 0.923 | Heracles attack 0.670 / defence 1.312. League average goals — home 1.631 / away 1.396. Heracles bring a strong defensive rating of 1.312 — this is suppressing NAC Breda's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 39 NAC Breda games / 39 Heracles games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NAC Breda 59% | Draw 23% | Heracles 18%. Fair-value odds: NAC Breda 1.69 | Draw 4.35 | Heracles 5.56. The model has a clear lean to NAC Breda (59%) — a 41pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 48% | Total xG 2.65. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.65 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 48% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is NAC Breda at 59% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 2.65 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 49% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence — though H2H averaging only 3.2 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 48% on No. This conflicts with form data: NAC Breda 80% | Heracles 40% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights