Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Prediction vindicated as Groningen edge out NEC Nijmegen 2-1.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Groningen beat NEC Nijmegen 2-1 at Euroborg, Regular Season - 22, in the Eredivisie. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Groningen 1.08 xG and NEC Nijmegen 0.77 xG, a combined 1.86. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Groningen beat their projection by 0.9 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Groningen attack 0.62 / defence 0.68 against NEC Nijmegen attack 0.82 / defence 1.05, drawn from 21/54 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Groningen 42% | Draw 32% | NEC Nijmegen 26%, with Groningen to win its most likely call at 42%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 28%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 56% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 36% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Groningen 51%, NEC Nijmegen 67%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Groningen's trading profile (55 games, 26 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.
NEC Nijmegen's trading profile (55 games, 26 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Groningen 1.62 PPG, NEC Nijmegen 1.40 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Groningen win broke the near-deadlock.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.