🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours NEC Nijmegen (61%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Excelsior face NEC Nijmegen.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Excelsior host NEC Nijmegen at Stadion Woudestein in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 29. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 4 April 2026 at 20:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Eredivisie games this season, Excelsior have gone 1W 4D 5L from 10 outings — a 0.70 PPG return. Last five: L L L L D. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Excelsior's home record at Stadion Woudestein: 3W 2D 5L from 10 Eredivisie appearances (1.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, NEC Nijmegen stand at 5W 3D 2L from 10 Eredivisie matches — 1.80 PPG. Last five: D L W W D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.20 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

NEC Nijmegen's form when playing away from home: 5W 4D 1L across 10 road games this term (1.90 PPG). They are averaging 2.30 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour NEC Nijmegen — 1.10 PPG ahead of the hosts (1.80 vs 0.70). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Excelsior register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, NEC Nijmegen in 90% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 5 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Excelsior, 3 for NEC Nijmegen and 1 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 5 meetings have averaged 4.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 9 Aug 2025, ended 0–5 with NEC Nijmegen winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Excelsior trading profile (63 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

NEC Nijmegen trading profile (63 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 57% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 44%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Excelsior 57% and NEC Nijmegen 64% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Excelsior 59% | NEC Nijmegen 70%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Excelsior 1.09 xG and NEC Nijmegen 2.19 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Excelsior attack 0.675 / defence 1.176 | NEC Nijmegen attack 1.399 / defence 0.938. League average goals — home 1.723 / away 1.328. Excelsior's attack strength of 0.675 is below the league average — the 1.09 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. NEC Nijmegen have an above-average attack strength of 1.399 — the away xG of 2.19 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 28 Excelsior games / 62 NEC Nijmegen games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Excelsior 17% | Draw 22% | NEC Nijmegen 61%. Fair-value odds: Excelsior 5.88 | Draw 4.55 | NEC Nijmegen 1.64. The model has a clear lean to NEC Nijmegen (61%) — a 44pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 64% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 3.28. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 64% — the 3.28 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.09 / 2.19) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is NEC Nijmegen at 61% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.28 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 64% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.0 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 60%. Form rates corroborate: Excelsior 60% | NEC Nijmegen 90% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights