🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Excelsior at 37%, yet other data sources diverge — this Excelsior vs NAC Breda fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Excelsior host NAC Breda at Stadion Woudestein in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 29 November 2025 at 15:30 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Excelsior stand at 4W 1D 5L from 10 Eredivisie matches — 1.30 PPG. Last five: W L D L W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Excelsior, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Excelsior at Stadion Woudestein this season: 6W 0D 4L from 10 home games — 1.80 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Stadion Woudestein. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 1.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.30 — Excelsior are significantly better at Stadion Woudestein than their overall form suggests.

Across all Eredivisie games this season, NAC Breda have recorded 2W 3D 5L from 10 outings — 0.90 PPG. Last five: D D W L L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for NAC Breda, so this record blends games from this season and last.

NAC Breda's form when playing away from home: 0W 3D 7L across 10 road games this term (0.30 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 0.30 is notably below their overall 0.90 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: Excelsior 1.30 PPG, NAC Breda 0.90 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 4 previous meetings, Excelsior have won 1, NAC Breda 2, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 4 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 5.5 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 2 Jun 2024, ended 4–1 with Excelsior winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 5.5 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

Excelsior in-play tendencies (47 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 39% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (home games).

NAC Breda in-play tendencies (47 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Excelsior 55% versus NAC Breda 60%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Excelsior 60% | NAC Breda 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Excelsior 1.32 xG and NAC Breda 1.30 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Excelsior attack 0.659 / defence 0.958 | NAC Breda attack 0.925 / defence 1.157. League average goals — home 1.736 / away 1.471. Excelsior's attack strength of 0.659 is below the league average — the 1.32 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 13 Excelsior games / 47 NAC Breda games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Excelsior 37% | Draw 26% | NAC Breda 36%. Fair-value odds: Excelsior 2.70 | Draw 3.85 | NAC Breda 2.78. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.63. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.63 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Excelsior are the pick at 37% — marginal model lean. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Excelsior offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.63 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 49% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction — though H2H averaging only 5.5 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 53%. Form rates are neutral: Excelsior 30% | NAC Breda 60%.

The outsider holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights