🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Jong Utrecht at 41%, yet other data sources diverge — this Jong Utrecht vs Jong PSV U21 fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Eerste Divisie clash, Regular Season - 23 as Jong Utrecht welcome Jong PSV U21 to Sportcomplex Zoudenbalch. Kick-off is set for Monday 19 January 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Eerste Divisie games this season, Jong Utrecht have gone 4W 3D 3L from 10 outings — a 1.50 PPG return. Last five: W W L W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.80 goals per game, with 1.60 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for Jong Utrecht, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Jong Utrecht's form when playing at home: 4W 2D 4L across 10 games at Sportcomplex Zoudenbalch this term (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Jong PSV U21 — All Games: 4W 1D 5L from 10 Eerste Divisie fixtures this season — 1.30 PPG. Last five: L W L L W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 2.40. Conceding 2.40 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Jong PSV U21, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Jong PSV U21's away record: 4W 2D 4L from 10 road trips in Eerste Divisie this season (1.40 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: Jong Utrecht 1.50 PPG, Jong PSV U21 1.30 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H

The previous 9 encounters between these sides heavily favour Jong PSV U21, who boast 5 victories compared to 2 for Jong Utrecht.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 2.6 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 21 Nov 2025, ended 3–3 with a draw.

It is worth noting that Jong PSV U21 have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 5 wins from 9 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

In-Play Profile

Jong Utrecht in-play tendencies (59 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 41%; they fail to score in 36% of games.

Jong PSV U21 in-play tendencies (59 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 87% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 58%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Jong Utrecht 59% and Jong PSV U21 70% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Jong Utrecht 59% | Jong PSV U21 76%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Jong Utrecht 2.03 xG and Jong PSV U21 1.92 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Jong Utrecht attack 0.975 / defence 1.156 | Jong PSV U21 attack 1.087 / defence 1.216. League average goals — home 1.708 / away 1.528. Jong PSV U21 bring a strong defensive rating of 1.216 — this is suppressing Jong Utrecht's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 59 Jong Utrecht games / 59 Jong PSV U21 games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Jong Utrecht 41% | Draw 21% | Jong PSV U21 37%. Fair-value odds: Jong Utrecht 2.44 | Draw 4.76 | Jong PSV U21 2.70. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 21% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 75% | BTTS probability 74% | Total xG 3.95. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 75% — a total xG of 3.95 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 74% reflects that both xG figures (2.03 / 1.92) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Jong Utrecht at 41% — marginal model lean. The opposing side holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.95 combined xG gives a 75% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 4.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 74% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Jong Utrecht 70% | Jong PSV U21 90% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights