🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Jong Utrecht at 62%, yet other data sources diverge — this Jong Utrecht vs Helmond Sport fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Helmond Sport make the trip to Sportcomplex Zoudenbalch to face Jong Utrecht in Eerste Divisie, Regular Season - 31. The match kicks off on Friday 13 March 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Jong Utrecht have collected 0.70 PPG across 10 Eerste Divisie outings this season: 1W 4D 5L. Last five: D L L L L. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.90 conceded. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

At home at Sportcomplex Zoudenbalch, Jong Utrecht have gone 3W 3D 4L this season (10 games, 1.20 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 90% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.70 — Jong Utrecht are significantly better at Sportcomplex Zoudenbalch than their overall form suggests.

Helmond Sport (all games): 2W 4D 4L across 10 Eerste Divisie outings this term — 1.00 points per game. Last five: W W L L D. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Helmond Sport away from home this season: 2W 1D 7L from 10 away games — 0.70 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.70 PPG for Jong Utrecht against 1.00 for Helmond Sport. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Jong Utrecht lead 4W to 4W over the last 9 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 2.9 per game across 9 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 16 Sep 2025, ended 1–2 with Helmond Sport winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 2.9 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

Jong Utrecht goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (68 games, 33 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 43%; they fail to score in 35% of games.

Helmond Sport goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (68 games, 33 at away): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Jong Utrecht 60% and Helmond Sport 63% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Jong Utrecht 59% | Helmond Sport 63%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Jong Utrecht 2.40 xG and Helmond Sport 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Jong Utrecht attack 1.115 / defence 1.232 | Helmond Sport attack 0.684 / defence 1.326. League average goals — home 1.620 / away 1.476. Helmond Sport bring a strong defensive rating of 1.326 — this is suppressing Jong Utrecht's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 68 Jong Utrecht games / 68 Helmond Sport games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Jong Utrecht 62% | Draw 20% | Helmond Sport 18%. Fair-value odds: Jong Utrecht 1.61 | Draw 5.00 | Helmond Sport 5.56. The model has a clear lean to Jong Utrecht (62%) — a 44pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 70% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.64. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 70% — a total xG of 3.64 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (2.40 / 1.24) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Jong Utrecht at 62% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 20% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.64 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 70% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.9 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 65% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Jong Utrecht 90% | Helmond Sport 30% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights