🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Jong Ajax at 46%, yet other data sources diverge — this Jong Ajax vs Almere City FC fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Sportcomplex De Toekomst plays host to Jong Ajax versus Almere City FC in Eerste Divisie, Regular Season - 33. Kick-off: Friday 20 March 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Current Form

Jong Ajax's overall Eerste Divisie record this term: 5W 2D 3L from 10 games (1.70 PPG). Last five: D W L W W. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.40 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Jong Ajax's form when playing at home: 4W 2D 4L across 10 games at Sportcomplex De Toekomst this term (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Almere City FC have collected 1.40 PPG across 10 Eerste Divisie outings this season: 4W 2D 4L. Last five: W L W W D. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.80. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

Almere City FC's form when playing away from home: 6W 1D 3L across 10 road games this term (1.90 PPG). They are averaging 2.30 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.90 exceeds their overall 1.40 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

Neither side holds a meaningful form edge. The 1.70 vs 1.40 PPG split is negligible — model and market signals should carry more analytical weight for this one.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Jong Ajax have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Almere City FC in 90%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 5 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Jong Ajax, 3 for Almere City FC and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.4 per game across 5 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 5 Dec 2025, ended 2–3 with Almere City FC winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.4 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Jong Ajax — key trading statistics (66 games, 33 at home): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 70% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (home games); they fail to score in 36% of games.

Almere City FC — key trading statistics (66 games, 33 at away): they score before half-time in 85% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%; they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Jong Ajax 52% versus Almere City FC 52%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Jong Ajax 54% | Almere City FC 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Jong Ajax 2.29 xG and Almere City FC 1.98 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Jong Ajax attack 1.165 / defence 1.075 | Almere City FC attack 1.270 / defence 1.261. League average goals — home 1.560 / away 1.448. Almere City FC bring a strong defensive rating of 1.261 — this is suppressing Jong Ajax's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Almere City FC have an above-average attack strength of 1.270 — the away xG of 1.98 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 70 Jong Ajax games / 32 Almere City FC games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Jong Ajax 46% | Draw 20% | Almere City FC 34%. Fair-value odds: Jong Ajax 2.17 | Draw 5.00 | Almere City FC 2.94. Jong Ajax hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (20%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 80% | BTTS probability 77% | Total xG 4.27. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 80% — a total xG of 4.27 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 77% reflects that both xG figures (2.29 / 1.98) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Jong Ajax are the pick at 46% — moderate model lean. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 4.27 combined xG gives a 80% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.7 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.4 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 77%. Form rates corroborate: Jong Ajax 60% | Almere City FC 90% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights