🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates FC OSS at 41% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this FC OSS vs Helmond Sport encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Eerste Divisie clash, Regular Season - 24 as FC OSS welcome Helmond Sport to Frans Heesen Stadion. Kick-off is set for Sunday 2 February 2025 at 15:45 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Eerste Divisie games this season, FC OSS have gone 3W 3D 4L from 10 outings — a 1.20 PPG return. Last five: W L W L L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for FC OSS, so this record blends games from this season and last.

FC OSS at Frans Heesen Stadion this season: 4W 2D 4L from 10 home games — 1.40 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Helmond Sport stand at 2W 1D 7L from 10 Eerste Divisie matches — 0.70 PPG. Last five: D L L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Helmond Sport, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Helmond Sport's away record: 4W 1D 5L from 10 road trips in Eerste Divisie this season (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.30 exceeds their overall 0.70 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

On current form, FC OSS have the edge — a 0.50 PPG advantage (1.20 vs 0.70) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 7 previous meetings, FC OSS have won 3, Helmond Sport 1, with 3 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.1 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 16 Sep 2024, ended 0–1 with Helmond Sport winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Data

FC OSS trading profile (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); they fail to score in 45% of games.

Helmond Sport trading profile (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — FC OSS 42% versus Helmond Sport 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (FC OSS 47% | Helmond Sport 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects FC OSS 1.44 xG and Helmond Sport 1.25 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: FC OSS attack 0.715 / defence 1.074 | Helmond Sport attack 0.895 / defence 1.221. League average goals — home 1.650 / away 1.297. FC OSS's attack strength of 0.715 is below the league average — the 1.44 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Helmond Sport bring a strong defensive rating of 1.221 — this is suppressing FC OSS's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 61 FC OSS games / 60 Helmond Sport games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: FC OSS 41% | Draw 27% | Helmond Sport 32%. Fair-value odds: FC OSS 2.44 | Draw 3.70 | Helmond Sport 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 50% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.69. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 50%/50% — the total xG of 2.69 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates FC OSS as the most likely outcome at 41% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on FC OSS offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.69 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 50% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 55% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: FC OSS 50% | Helmond Sport 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights