🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Cambuur's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Kooi Stadion, Regular Season - 18, as Cambuur and Helmond Sport drew 0-0 in the Eerste Divisie. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cambuur 2.32 xG and Helmond Sport 0.91 xG, a combined 3.23. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Cambuur fell 2.3 short of their projected output. Helmond Sport landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cambuur attack 1.35 / defence 0.80 against Helmond Sport attack 0.78 / defence 1.00, drawn from 55/55 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cambuur 69% | Draw 18% | Helmond Sport 13%, with Cambuur to win its most likely call at 69%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 18% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 83% and missed. Over 3.5 was 40% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 56% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cambuur 49%, Helmond Sport 64%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cambuur's trading profile (55 games, 27 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and duly kept one.

Helmond Sport's trading profile (55 games, 27 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 66% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Cambuur arrived the stronger side — 1.93 PPG against 1.24. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Cambuur (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.85 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line. Helmond Sport (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.11 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.85 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights