Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Shock result as Cesena defy the odds to beat Reggiana 1-2.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Cesena beat Reggiana 1-2 at MAPEI Stadium - Città del Tricolore, Regular Season - 20, in the Serie B. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Reggiana 1.15 xG and Cesena 1.15 xG, a combined 2.30. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Cesena outscored their 1.15 projection by 0.9. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Reggiana attack 0.92 / defence 1.20 against Cesena attack 0.91 / defence 0.96, drawn from 57/57 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Reggiana 35% | Draw 30% | Cesena 35%, with Reggiana to win its most likely call at 35%. The actual Cesena win had been the model's second-ranked read at 35%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 40%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 68% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Reggiana 53%, Cesena 40%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Reggiana's trading profile (57 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.
Cesena's trading profile (57 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Reggiana 1.12 PPG, Cesena 1.42 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Cesena win broke the near-deadlock. Cesena (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.04 average — above their attacking norm.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.