🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Catanzaro edge out Venezia 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Catanzaro beat Venezia 2-1 at Stadio Nicola Ceravolo, Regular Season - 11, in the Serie B. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Catanzaro 1.28 xG and Venezia 0.96 xG, a combined 2.24. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Catanzaro attack 0.89 / defence 0.96 against Venezia attack 0.89 / defence 1.06, drawn from 48/10 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Catanzaro 40% | Draw 36% | Venezia 24%, with Catanzaro to win its most likely call at 40%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 39%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 69% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 47% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Catanzaro 48%, Venezia 46%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Catanzaro's trading profile (48 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

Venezia's trading profile (48 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Catanzaro arrived the stronger side — 1.38 PPG against 0.94. That form edge translated into the three points.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights