🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Udinese's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Udinese and Como finished level at 0-0 at Bluenergy Stadium - Stadio Friuli, Regular Season - 31, in the Serie A. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Udinese 0.86 xG and Como 1.46 xG, a combined 2.32. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Udinese fell 0.9 short of their projected output. Como landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Udinese attack 0.91 / defence 0.95 against Como attack 1.30 / defence 0.74, drawn from 68/68 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Udinese 22% | Draw 27% | Como 51%, with Como to win its most likely call at 51%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 41%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 67% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 44% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Udinese 50%, Como 46%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Udinese's trading profile (68 games, 33 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 28% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Como's trading profile (68 games, 33 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Udinese 1.22 PPG, Como 1.56 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Udinese (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.09 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.36 average — tighter than their form line. Como (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.30 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.12 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights