🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Juventus and Hellas Verona share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Juventus and Hellas Verona finished level at 1-1 at Allianz Stadium, Regular Season - 35, in the Serie A. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Juventus 2.20 xG and Hellas Verona 0.68 xG, a combined 2.89. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Juventus fell 1.2 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Juventus attack 1.36 / defence 0.78 against Hellas Verona attack 0.79 / defence 1.30, drawn from 72/72 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Juventus 72% | Draw 18% | Hellas Verona 10%, with Juventus to win its most likely call at 72%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 18% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 44% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 47% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Juventus 42%, Hellas Verona 51%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 45%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Juventus's trading profile (72 games, 36 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 44% of the time, and conceded here.

Hellas Verona's trading profile (72 games, 36 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Juventus arrived the stronger side — 1.86 PPG against 0.78. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Juventus (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.81 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights