🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Hellas Verona's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stadio Marcantonio Bentegodi, Regular Season - 24, as Hellas Verona and Pisa drew 0-0 in the Serie A. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Hellas Verona 1.75 xG and Pisa 1.85 xG, a combined 3.61. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Hellas Verona fell 1.8 short of their projected output. Pisa landed 1.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Hellas Verona attack 0.88 / defence 1.44 against Pisa attack 1.10 / defence 1.60, drawn from 61/23 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Hellas Verona 37% | Draw 22% | Pisa 41%, with Pisa to win its most likely call at 41%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 70%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 88% and missed. Over 3.5 was 49% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 70% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Hellas Verona 52%, Pisa 51%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Hellas Verona's trading profile (61 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 46% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Pisa's trading profile (61 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Pisa arrived the stronger side — 1.44 PPG against 0.84. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Hellas Verona (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.87 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.83 average — tighter than their form line. Pisa (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.37 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.50 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights