🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Cremonese's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stadio Giovanni Zini, Regular Season - 21, as Cremonese and Hellas Verona drew 0-0 in the Serie A. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cremonese 1.42 xG and Hellas Verona 1.34 xG, a combined 2.76. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Cremonese fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Hellas Verona landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cremonese attack 0.95 / defence 1.30 against Hellas Verona attack 0.89 / defence 1.28, drawn from 20/58 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cremonese 39% | Draw 25% | Hellas Verona 35%, with Cremonese to win its most likely call at 39%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 52%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 76% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cremonese 53%, Hellas Verona 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 54%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cremonese's trading profile (58 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

Hellas Verona's trading profile (58 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 45% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Cremonese arrived the stronger side — 1.45 PPG against 0.86. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Cremonese (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.54 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.25 average — tighter than their form line. Hellas Verona (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.86 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.71 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights