Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Serie A · Regular Season - 34

Kick-off

Sun 26 Apr 2026

19:45

Venue

Stadio Giuseppe Meazza

Competition

Serie A

Italy

Status

FT
📰

Stalemate at AC Milan's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stadio Giuseppe Meazza, Regular Season - 34, as AC Milan and Juventus drew 0-0 in the Serie A. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AC Milan 1.09 xG and Juventus 1.47 xG, a combined 2.56. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. AC Milan fell 1.1 short of their projected output. Juventus landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AC Milan attack 0.99 / defence 1.03 against Juventus attack 1.26 / defence 0.89, drawn from 71/71 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AC Milan 28% | Draw 26% | Juventus 46%, with Juventus to win its most likely call at 46%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 47%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 72% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 47% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AC Milan 52%, Juventus 42%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AC Milan's trading profile (71 games, 35 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and duly kept one.

Juventus's trading profile (71 games, 35 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 44% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — AC Milan 1.82 PPG, Juventus 1.87 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. AC Milan (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.49 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.91 average — tighter than their form line. Juventus (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.43 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.03 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 47% Over 2.5 probability, 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 51% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 47% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.