🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Sligo Rovers run riot with a 0-4 hammering of Waterford.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Sligo Rovers beat Waterford 0-4 at Regional Sports Centre, Regular Season - 10, in the Premier Division. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Waterford 1.68 xG and Sligo Rovers 1.54 xG, a combined 3.21. The scoreboard read 0-4 for 4 actual goals. Waterford fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Sligo Rovers outscored their 1.54 projection by 2.5. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Waterford attack 0.85 / defence 1.24 against Sligo Rovers attack 1.15 / defence 1.57, drawn from 45/45 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Waterford 41% | Draw 24% | Sligo Rovers 35%, with Waterford to win its most likely call at 41%. The actual Sligo Rovers win had been the model's second-ranked read at 35%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 40% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 64% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Waterford 51%, Sligo Rovers 51%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 46%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Waterford's trading profile (37 games, 19 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 38% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Sligo Rovers's trading profile (37 games, 19 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Waterford 1.30 PPG, Sligo Rovers 1.32 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Sligo Rovers win broke the near-deadlock. Waterford (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.42 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 1.11 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Sligo Rovers (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.21 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 2.11 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights