🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates St Patrick's Athl. at 45% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this St Patrick's Athl. vs Sligo Rovers encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Premier Division clash, Regular Season - 27 as St Patrick's Athl. welcome Sligo Rovers to Richmond Park. Kick-off is set for Sunday 10 August 2025 at 18:00 UTC.

Form Guide

St Patrick's Athl. — All Games: 2W 4D 4L from 10 Premier Division outings this season, averaging 1.00 points per game. Last five: L L D D W. They are averaging 0.60 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their games — a low BTTS rate that suggests clean sheets are a regular occurrence. This season is still relatively young for St Patrick's Athl., so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Richmond Park, St Patrick's Athl. have gone 3W 5D 2L this season (10 games, 1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Richmond Park. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Sligo Rovers stand at 4W 2D 4L from 10 Premier Division matches — 1.40 PPG. Last five: D D W W L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Sligo Rovers, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Sligo Rovers's form when playing away from home: 3W 2D 5L across 10 road games this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.00 PPG (St Patrick's Athl.) versus 1.40 (Sligo Rovers). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

H2H

The fixture history tells a clear story: St Patrick's Athl. have dominated this rivalry, winning 4 of 5 past contests while Sligo Rovers have managed just 1 wins.

The 5 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.2 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 30 May 2025, ended 1–0 with St Patrick's Athl. winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both St Patrick's Athl. and goals. The home side's 4 wins from 5 meetings, combined with an average of 3.2 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

In-Play Profile

St Patrick's Athl. in-play tendencies (62 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 44% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (home games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

Sligo Rovers in-play tendencies (62 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 63% of games (away games); they fail to score in 37% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — St Patrick's Athl. 45% versus Sligo Rovers 45%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (St Patrick's Athl. 50% | Sligo Rovers 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects St Patrick's Athl. 1.48 xG and Sligo Rovers 1.13 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: St Patrick's Athl. attack 0.914 / defence 0.904 | Sligo Rovers attack 1.214 / defence 1.233. League average goals — home 1.314 / away 1.028. Sligo Rovers bring a strong defensive rating of 1.233 — this is suppressing St Patrick's Athl.'s projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Sligo Rovers have an above-average attack strength of 1.214 — the away xG of 1.13 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 62 St Patrick's Athl. games / 62 Sligo Rovers games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: St Patrick's Athl. 45% | Draw 27% | Sligo Rovers 28%. Fair-value odds: St Patrick's Athl. 2.22 | Draw 3.70 | Sligo Rovers 3.57. St Patrick's Athl. hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.61. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.61 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is St Patrick's Athl. at 45% — moderate model lean. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on St Patrick's Athl. offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.61 combined xG gives a 48% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration — though H2H averaging only 3.2 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

Poisson assigns a 53% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: St Patrick's Athl. 30% | Sligo Rovers 50% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights