Volos NFC 0-0 Lamia – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Lamia at 45%, yet in-form Volos NFC provide a compelling counter-argument — this Volos NFC vs Lamia fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Volos NFC and Lamia meet at Panthessaliko Stadio in Super League 1, Regular Season - 13. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 30 November 2024 at 15:00 UTC.

Form

Volos NFC (all games): 3W 1D 6L across 10 Super League 1 fixtures this term — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L W L L W. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Volos NFC, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Volos NFC's home record at Panthessaliko Stadio: 3W 2D 5L from 10 Super League 1 appearances (1.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Lamia have collected 0.40 PPG across 10 Super League 1 outings this season: 0W 4D 6L. Last five: D D L L D. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Lamia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Lamia away from home this season: 1W 2D 7L from 10 away games — 0.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 2.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Form favours the hosts. Volos NFC's 1.00 PPG return is 0.60 points per game ahead of Lamia's 0.40 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Volos NFC have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Lamia in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 6 meetings: Volos NFC 2W, Lamia 0W, 4D.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.3 goals per game across 6 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 17 Dec 2023, ended 2–1 with Volos NFC winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.3 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Volos NFC half-time and goal-timing data (45 games, 22 at home): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (home games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

Lamia half-time and goal-timing data (45 games, 22 at away): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Volos NFC 53% versus Lamia 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Volos NFC 53% | Lamia 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Volos NFC 1.06 xG and Lamia 1.41 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Volos NFC attack 0.723 / defence 1.208 | Lamia attack 0.926 / defence 1.175. League average goals — home 1.253 / away 1.264. Volos NFC's attack strength of 0.723 is below the league average — the 1.06 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 38 Volos NFC games / 38 Lamia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Volos NFC 28% | Draw 27% | Lamia 45%. Fair-value odds: Volos NFC 3.57 | Draw 3.70 | Lamia 2.22. Lamia hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 45% | BTTS probability 50% | Total xG 2.48. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 55% — total xG of 2.48 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 50% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Lamia at 45% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Volos NFC (1.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Lamia if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.48 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 45% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence — though form averaging only 3.0 goals per game and H2H averaging only 3.3 goals per meeting point in the other direction.

Poisson assigns a 50% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Volos NFC 60% | Lamia 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights