Sign in Register

RB Leipzig 2-2 1. FC Heidenheim – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Bundesliga · Regular Season - 23

Kick-off

Sun 23 Feb 2025

14:30

Venue

Red Bull Arena

Competition

Bundesliga

Germany

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours RB Leipzig (59%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as RB Leipzig face 1. FC Heidenheim.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

RB Leipzig host 1. FC Heidenheim at Red Bull Arena in Bundesliga, Regular Season - 23. Kick-off is scheduled for Sunday 23 February 2025 at 14:30 UTC.

Form Guide

RB Leipzig — All Games: 4W 4D 2L from 10 Bundesliga outings this season, averaging 1.60 points per game. Last five: D D D W D. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.50 conceded. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for RB Leipzig, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Red Bull Arena, RB Leipzig have gone 6W 3D 1L this season (10 games, 2.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Red Bull Arena. Their home PPG of 2.10 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.60 — RB Leipzig are significantly better at Red Bull Arena than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, 1. FC Heidenheim stand at 1W 1D 8L from 10 Bundesliga matches — 0.40 PPG. Last five: L L L L L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for 1. FC Heidenheim, so this record blends games from this season and last.

1. FC Heidenheim away from home this season: 1W 1D 8L from 10 away games — 0.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

On current form, RB Leipzig have the edge — a 1.20 PPG advantage (1.60 vs 0.40) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

H2H Record

RB Leipzig hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 3 wins from 3 previous encounters compared to 0 for 1. FC Heidenheim, with 0 draws in between.

The 3 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 6 Oct 2024, ended 1–0 with RB Leipzig winning.

The historical record gives RB Leipzig a meaningful edge here — 3 wins from 3 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

In-Play Data

RB Leipzig trading profile (56 games, 27 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 45%.

1. FC Heidenheim trading profile (56 games, 27 at away): they score before half-time in 89% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 70% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 38%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RB Leipzig 59% versus 1. FC Heidenheim 61%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RB Leipzig 62% | 1. FC Heidenheim 54%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RB Leipzig 2.34 xG and 1. FC Heidenheim 1.32 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RB Leipzig attack 1.172 / defence 0.986 | 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.998 / defence 1.197. League average goals — home 1.668 / away 1.347. Data: 56 RB Leipzig games / 56 1. FC Heidenheim games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RB Leipzig 59% | Draw 21% | 1. FC Heidenheim 20%. Fair-value odds: RB Leipzig 1.69 | Draw 4.76 | 1. FC Heidenheim 5.00. The model has a clear lean to RB Leipzig (59%) — a 39pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 71% | BTTS probability 67% | Total xG 3.66. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 71% — a total xG of 3.66 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 67% reflects that both xG figures (2.34 / 1.32) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, RB Leipzig are the pick at 59% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 21% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.66 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 71% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.5 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 67%. Form rates corroborate: RB Leipzig 50% | 1. FC Heidenheim 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H RB Leipzig hold a strong historical advantage, winning 3 of 3 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to RB Leipzig — H2H win rate 100% vs Poisson 59%.
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 67% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form RB Leipzig lead on PPG: 1.60 vs 0.40 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form RB Leipzig Poisson xG (2.34) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.90) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour RB Leipzig — RB Leipzig at 59% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours RB Leipzig at 59% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 71% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 67% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim | Competition: Bundesliga, Regular Season - 23 | Venue: Red Bull Arena • Kick-off: Sunday 23 Feb 2025, 14:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: RB Leipzig 59% | Draw 21% | 1. FC Heidenheim 20% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 71% | BTTS 67% | xG RB Leipzig 2.34 / 1. FC Heidenheim 1.32 • Poisson strength factors: RB Leipzig attack 1.172 / def 0.986 | 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.998 / def 1.197 | league avg home 1.668 / away 1.347 • Poisson stance: RB Leipzig (59%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.34

RB Leipzig xG

Expected Goals

1.32

1. FC Heidenheim xG

59%
21%
20%
RB Leipzig Draw 1. FC Heidenheim

67%

BTTS

89%

Over 1.5

71%

Over 2.5

50%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim kick off?

RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim kicked off at 14:30 on Sunday 23 February 2025 at Red Bull Arena.

What was the final score in RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim?

RB Leipzig 2 - 2 1. FC Heidenheim.

Where is RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim being played?

The match is being played at Red Bull Arena.

What competition is RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim part of?

RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim is a Regular Season - 23 fixture in the Bundesliga (Germany).

Who is favourite to win RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim?

Our statistical model gives RB Leipzig a 59% chance of winning, 1. FC Heidenheim a 20% chance, and a 21% chance of a draw — making RB Leipzig the favourite.

Will both teams score in RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim?

Our model estimates a 67% probability that both RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim will score (BTTS).

Will RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 71%.

What is the head-to-head record between RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim?

Record (3 meetings): RB Leipzig 3W | Draws 0 | 1. FC Heidenheim 0W.

What form are RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim in?

RB Leipzig (all comps): 4W-4D-2L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.50 | L5 D-D-D-W-D. 1. FC Heidenheim (all comps): 1W-1D-8L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 2.10 | L5 L-L-L-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

The model rates RB Leipzig's attack at 1.17x the league average against 1. FC Heidenheim's defence at 1.20x — combine the two and it projects 2.34 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, 1. FC Heidenheim's attack versus RB Leipzig's defence, projects 1.32 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 56/56 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 2-1 carries the highest individual probability at 9.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-1 (9.0%), 3-1 (7.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 26% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

RB Leipzig Win

59%

RB Leipzig

1.70

21%

Draw

4.68

20%

1. FC Heidenheim

5.09

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.3%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

7.9%

Draw

3 – 1

7.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.34

RB Leipzig xG

Total xG

3.66

1.32

1. FC Heidenheim xG

59%
21%
20%
RB LeipzigDraw1. FC Heidenheim

1.70

59%

Home win

4.68

21%

Draw

5.09

20%

Away win

Goals Markets

88%

Over 1.5

1.14

12%

Under 1.5

8.33

71%

Over 2.5

1.41

29%

Under 2.5

3.45

50%

Over 3.5

2.00

50%

Under 3.5

2.00

31%

Over 4.5

3.23

69%

Under 4.5

1.45

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

67%

BTTS Yes

1.48

33%

BTTS No

3.07

Clean Sheet

27%

RB Leipzig

3.76

10%

1. FC Heidenheim

10.37

Win to Nil

16%

RB Leipzig

6.38

2%

1. FC Heidenheim

52.80

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 2.6 3.4 2.2 1.0 0.3 0.1
1 6.0 7.9 5.3 2.3 0.8 0.2
2 7.0 9.3 6.2 2.7 0.9 0.2
3 5.5 7.2 4.8 2.1 0.7 0.2
4 3.2 4.2 2.8 1.2 0.4 0.1
5 1.5 2.0 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.339
λ Away (xG) 1.325
Total xG 3.664
League avg home goals 1.668
League avg away goals 1.347
RB Leipzig attack strength 1.172
RB Leipzig defence strength 0.986
1. FC Heidenheim attack strength 0.998
1. FC Heidenheim defence strength 1.197
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 56 / 56

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.3%.

How many goals are RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim expected to score?

The model projects 2.34 expected goals for RB Leipzig and 1.32 for 1. FC Heidenheim, a combined total of 3.66.

How confident is the prediction model for RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 59%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

RB Leipzig's recent record stands at 29W 15D 12L from 56 games, a 1.82 PPG return, with D-D-D-W-D in the last five. The sample for RB Leipzig is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

1. FC Heidenheim, meanwhile, have gone 14W 14D 28L across 56 games — 1.00 PPG, with L-L-L-L-L in their last five. The sample for 1. FC Heidenheim is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours RB Leipzig by 0.82 — a real, if not enormous, edge over 1. FC Heidenheim heading into this one.

Venue Form

At home specifically, RB Leipzig have managed 17W 7D 3L from 27 games — 2.15 PPG in front of their own supporters.

1. FC Heidenheim's away record stands at 5W 8D 14L across 27 trips, a 0.85 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RB Leipzig come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

RB Leipzig are averaging 2.02 goals scored and 1.21 conceded per game recently; 1. FC Heidenheim are on 1.34 scored and 1.79 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: 1. FC Heidenheim in 61%.

Defensively: RB Leipzig have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 56 Results — Bundesliga

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

RB Leipzig

RB Leipzig

Blended
D D D W D
1. FC Heidenheim

1. FC Heidenheim

Blended
L L L L L
56 Played 56
29/15/12 W / D / L 14/14/28
1.82 Points Per Game 1.00
2.02 Avg Goals Scored 1.34
1.21 Avg Goals Conceded 1.79
3.23 Avg Goals / Game 3.12
21 Clean Sheets 11
33 BTTS 34
35 Over 2.5 Games 30
RB Leipzig

RB Leipzig

D
A FC Augsburg
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Feb
W
H FC St. Pauli
2–0 HT 2–0
09 Feb
D
A Union Berlin
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Feb
D
H Bayer Leverkusen
2–2 HT 1–2
25 Jan
D
A VfL Bochum
3–3 HT 3–0
18 Jan
L
A VfB Stuttgart
1–2 HT 1–0
15 Jan
W
H Werder Bremen
4–2 HT 2–1
12 Jan
L
A Bayern München
1–5 HT 1–3
20 Dec
W
H Eintracht Frankfurt
2–1 HT 1–1
15 Dec
W
A Holstein Kiel
2–0 HT 1–0
07 Dec
L
H VfL Wolfsburg
1–5 HT 0–3
30 Nov
L
A 1899 Hoffenheim
3–4 HT 2–1
23 Nov
D
H Borussia Mönchengladbach
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Nov
L
A Borussia Dortmund
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
W
H SC Freiburg
3–1 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
A FSV Mainz 05
2–0 HT 2–0
19 Oct
W
A 1. FC Heidenheim
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Oct
W
H FC Augsburg
4–0 HT 2–0
28 Sep
D
A FC St. Pauli
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Sep
D
H Union Berlin
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
A Bayer Leverkusen
3–2 HT 1–2
31 Aug
W
H VfL Bochum
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
D
A Eintracht Frankfurt
2–2 HT 1–0
18 May
D
H Werder Bremen
1–1 HT 0–1
11 May
D
A 1899 Hoffenheim
1–1 HT 1–0
03 May
W
H Borussia Dortmund
4–1 HT 2–1
27 Apr
W
A 1. FC Heidenheim
2–1 HT 1–0
20 Apr
W
H VfL Wolfsburg
3–0 HT 1–0
13 Apr
W
A SC Freiburg
4–1 HT 3–0
06 Apr
D
H FSV Mainz 05
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Mar
W
A 1. FC Köln
5–1 HT 1–1
15 Mar
W
H SV Darmstadt 98
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Mar
W
A VfL Bochum
4–1 HT 1–1
02 Mar
L
A Bayern München
1–2 HT 0–0
24 Feb
W
H Borussia Mönchengladbach
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Feb
D
A FC Augsburg
2–2 HT 1–1
10 Feb
W
H Union Berlin
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Feb
L
A VfB Stuttgart
2–5 HT 1–2
27 Jan
L
H Bayer Leverkusen
2–3 HT 1–0
20 Jan
L
H Eintracht Frankfurt
0–1 HT 0–1
13 Jan
D
A Werder Bremen
1–1 HT 0–0
19 Dec
W
H 1899 Hoffenheim
3–1 HT 1–1
16 Dec
W
A Borussia Dortmund
3–2 HT 1–1
09 Dec
W
H 1. FC Heidenheim
2–1 HT 2–1
02 Dec
L
A VfL Wolfsburg
1–2 HT 0–1
25 Nov
W
H SC Freiburg
3–1 HT 1–1
12 Nov
L
A FSV Mainz 05
0–2 HT 0–0
04 Nov
W
H 1. FC Köln
6–0 HT 4–0
28 Oct
W
A SV Darmstadt 98
3–1 HT 2–1
21 Oct
D
H VfL Bochum
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Oct
D
H Bayern München
2–2 HT 2–0
30 Sep
W
A Borussia Mönchengladbach
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H FC Augsburg
3–0 HT 3–0
16 Sep
W
A Union Berlin
3–0 HT 0–0
03 Sep
W
H VfB Stuttgart
5–1 HT 0–1
25 Aug
L
A Bayer Leverkusen
2–3 HT 1–2
19 Aug
1. FC Heidenheim

1. FC Heidenheim

L
H FSV Mainz 05
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Feb
L
A SC Freiburg
0–1 HT 0–1
08 Feb
L
H Borussia Dortmund
1–2 HT 0–1
01 Feb
L
A FC Augsburg
1–2 HT 0–1
25 Jan
L
H FC St. Pauli
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Jan
D
A Werder Bremen
3–3 HT 1–1
15 Jan
W
H Union Berlin
2–0 HT 1–0
11 Jan
L
A VfL Bochum
0–2 HT 0–2
22 Dec
L
H VfB Stuttgart
1–3 HT 1–2
15 Dec
L
A Bayern München
2–4 HT 0–1
07 Dec
L
H Eintracht Frankfurt
0–4 HT 0–1
01 Dec
L
A Bayer Leverkusen
2–5 HT 2–2
23 Nov
L
H VfL Wolfsburg
1–3 HT 0–2
10 Nov
L
A Holstein Kiel
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H 1899 Hoffenheim
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Oct
L
A Borussia Mönchengladbach
2–3 HT 1–1
19 Oct
L
H RB Leipzig
0–1 HT 0–0
06 Oct
W
A FSV Mainz 05
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Sep
L
H SC Freiburg
0–3 HT 0–0
21 Sep
L
A Borussia Dortmund
2–4 HT 1–3
13 Sep
W
H FC Augsburg
4–0 HT 2–0
01 Sep
W
A FC St. Pauli
2–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug
W
H 1. FC Köln
4–1 HT 3–0
18 May
D
A SC Freiburg
1–1 HT 1–1
11 May
D
H FSV Mainz 05
1–1 HT 0–1
05 May
W
A SV Darmstadt 98
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Apr
L
H RB Leipzig
1–2 HT 0–1
20 Apr
D
A VfL Bochum
1–1 HT 0–0
13 Apr
W
H Bayern München
3–2 HT 0–2
06 Apr
D
A VfB Stuttgart
3–3 HT 0–1
31 Mar
D
H Borussia Mönchengladbach
1–1 HT 0–1
16 Mar
L
A FC Augsburg
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Mar
L
H Eintracht Frankfurt
1–2 HT 0–1
02 Mar
D
A Union Berlin
2–2 HT 1–2
24 Feb
L
H Bayer Leverkusen
1–2 HT 0–1
17 Feb
W
A Werder Bremen
2–1 HT 2–1
10 Feb
D
H Borussia Dortmund
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Feb
D
A 1899 Hoffenheim
1–1 HT 1–1
27 Jan
D
H VfL Wolfsburg
1–1 HT 1–1
20 Jan
D
A 1. FC Köln
1–1 HT 0–1
13 Jan
W
H SC Freiburg
3–2 HT 0–1
20 Dec
W
A FSV Mainz 05
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Dec
W
H SV Darmstadt 98
3–2 HT 1–0
09 Dec
L
A RB Leipzig
1–2 HT 1–2
02 Dec
D
H VfL Bochum
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Nov
L
A Bayern München
2–4 HT 0–2
11 Nov
W
H VfB Stuttgart
2–0 HT 0–0
05 Nov
L
A Borussia Mönchengladbach
1–2 HT 1–1
28 Oct
L
H FC Augsburg
2–5 HT 2–3
22 Oct
L
A Eintracht Frankfurt
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Oct
W
H Union Berlin
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Sep
L
A Bayer Leverkusen
1–4 HT 0–1
24 Sep
W
H Werder Bremen
4–2 HT 2–0
17 Sep
D
A Borussia Dortmund
2–2 HT 0–2
01 Sep
L
H 1899 Hoffenheim
2–3 HT 1–0
26 Aug
L
A VfL Wolfsburg
0–2 HT 0–2
19 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim in coming into this match?

RB Leipzig have gone 29W 15D 12L in their last 56 games (1.82 PPG), while 1. FC Heidenheim have gone 14W 14D 28L in their last 56 (1.00 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — RB Leipzig at home or 1. FC Heidenheim away?

RB Leipzig's home record (2.15 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RB Leipzig at home: 2.15 PPG; 1. FC Heidenheim away: 0.85 PPG.

Have RB Leipzig or 1. FC Heidenheim been keeping clean sheets recently?

RB Leipzig have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their recent games, 1. FC Heidenheim in 20%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to December 2023. Every recorded meeting has come in Bundesliga. They last met on 24 January 2026, roughly 7 months ago.

Streaks & Records

RB Leipzig go into this on the back of 2 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 24 Jan 2026, when RB Leipzig won 0-3 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

RB Leipzig's record when hosting 1. FC Heidenheim specifically: 2W 1D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

RB Leipzig

5

RB Leipzig

1

Draws

1. FC Heidenheim

0

1. FC Heidenheim

Recent Meetings

1. FC Heidenheim
0–3
24 Jan 26
RB Leipzig
RB Leipzig
2–0
30 Aug 25
1. FC Heidenheim
RB Leipzig
2–2
23 Feb 25
1. FC Heidenheim
1. FC Heidenheim
0–1
06 Oct 24
RB Leipzig
1. FC Heidenheim
1–2
20 Apr 24
RB Leipzig
RB Leipzig
2–1
02 Dec 23
1. FC Heidenheim

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim?

From 6 meetings on record, RB Leipzig have won 5, 1. FC Heidenheim have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.

When did RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim last play each other?

They last met on 24 January 2026, when 1. FC Heidenheim 0-3 RB Leipzig.

Who has won more matches between RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim?

RB Leipzig have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

RB Leipzig are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 82% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 48% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 15% of those situations.

1. FC Heidenheim are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 89% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 15% of those situations.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RB Leipzig 48%, 1. FC Heidenheim 67% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 59% (RB Leipzig) and 52% (1. FC Heidenheim). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 44% and 37% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: RB Leipzig keep a clean sheet in 48% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = RB Leipzig home games / 1. FC Heidenheim away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

RB Leipzig RB Leipzig Blended
Metric All
(56 games)
Venue
(27 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/56
(75%)
22/27
(81.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 27/56
(48.2%)
13/27
(48.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/14
(50%)
1/5
(20%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/14
(28.6%)
0/5
(0%)
Winning at HT 23/56
(41.1%)
13/27
(48.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/56
(12.5%)
2/27
(7.4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/56
(8.9%)
4/27
(14.8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 33/56
(58.9%)
13/27
(48.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 35/56
(62.5%)
16/27
(59.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 25/56
(44.6%)
12/27
(44.4%)
Clean Sheet 21/56
(37.5%)
13/27
(48.1%)
Failed to Score 9/56
(16.1%)
5/27
(18.5%)
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim Blended
Metric All
(56 games)
Venue
(27 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 46/56
(82.1%)
24/27
(88.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/56
(39.3%)
13/27
(48.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/10
(70%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/10
(40%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 9/56
(16.1%)
3/27
(11.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/56
(1.8%)
0/27
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/56
(14.3%)
4/27
(14.8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 34/56
(60.7%)
18/27
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 30/56
(53.6%)
14/27
(51.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 21/56
(37.5%)
10/27
(37%)
Clean Sheet 11/56
(19.6%)
4/27
(14.8%)
Failed to Score 14/56
(25%)
5/27
(18.5%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when RB Leipzig play 1. FC Heidenheim?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 48% of RB Leipzig's games and 67% of 1. FC Heidenheim's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is RB Leipzig vs 1. FC Heidenheim usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 59% of RB Leipzig's matches and 52% of 1. FC Heidenheim's.

Do RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim tend to score early?

RB Leipzig have had a goal before half-time in 82% of their recent matches, 1. FC Heidenheim in 89% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

RB Leipzig and 1. FC Heidenheim finished level at 2-2 at Red Bull Arena, Regular Season - 23, in the Bundesliga. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting RB Leipzig 2.34 xG and 1. FC Heidenheim 1.32 xG, a combined 3.66. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RB Leipzig attack 1.17 / defence 0.99 against 1. FC Heidenheim attack 1.00 / defence 1.20, drawn from 56/56 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it RB Leipzig 59% | Draw 21% | 1. FC Heidenheim 20%, with RB Leipzig to win its most likely call at 59%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 21% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 71%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 89% and landed. Over 3.5 was 50% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 67% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RB Leipzig 62%, 1. FC Heidenheim 54%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 60%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

RB Leipzig's trading profile (56 games, 27 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.

1. FC Heidenheim's trading profile (56 games, 27 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, RB Leipzig arrived the stronger side — 1.82 PPG against 1.00. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. RB Leipzig (home/away splits) shipped 2 against a 0.85 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 71% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 67% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 58% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.