🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant RB Leipzig run riot with a 0-3 hammering of 1. FC Heidenheim.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

RB Leipzig beat 1. FC Heidenheim 0-3 at Voith-Arena, Regular Season - 19, in the Bundesliga. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting 1. FC Heidenheim 1.21 xG and RB Leipzig 1.73 xG, a combined 2.94. The scoreboard read 0-3 for 3 actual goals. 1. FC Heidenheim fell 1.2 short of their projected output. RB Leipzig outscored their 1.73 projection by 1.3. Those figures were built on strength ratings of 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.77 / defence 1.24 against RB Leipzig attack 0.97 / defence 0.91, drawn from 52/51 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it 1. FC Heidenheim 25% | Draw 28% | RB Leipzig 47%, with RB Leipzig to win its most likely call at 47%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 81% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (1. FC Heidenheim 63%, RB Leipzig 57%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

1. FC Heidenheim's trading profile (51 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 39% of games, a blank that repeated today.

RB Leipzig's trading profile (51 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, RB Leipzig arrived the stronger side — 1.63 PPG against 0.78. That form edge translated into the three points. 1. FC Heidenheim (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.84 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 2.04 concession average — a leakier day than usual. RB Leipzig (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.24 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.52 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights