🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Bayern München run riot with a 0-4 hammering of 1. FC Heidenheim.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Bayern München beat 1. FC Heidenheim 0-4 at Voith-Arena, Regular Season - 15, in the Bundesliga. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting 1. FC Heidenheim 0.95 xG and Bayern München 2.73 xG, a combined 3.68. The scoreboard read 0-4 for 4 actual goals. 1. FC Heidenheim fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Bayern München outscored their 2.73 projection by 1.3. Those figures were built on strength ratings of 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.80 / defence 1.14 against Bayern München attack 1.70 / defence 0.73, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it 1. FC Heidenheim 10% | Draw 17% | Bayern München 74%, with Bayern München to win its most likely call at 74%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 71%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 89% and landed. Over 3.5 was 50% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 73% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (1. FC Heidenheim 62%, Bayern München 83%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

1. FC Heidenheim's trading profile (48 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 40% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Bayern München's trading profile (48 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 48% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Bayern München arrived the stronger side — 2.50 PPG against 0.79. The form guide was vindicated by the result. 1. FC Heidenheim (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.83 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 1.96 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Bayern München (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 2.87 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 0.91 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights