🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Bayern München run riot with a 0-4 hammering of 1. FC Heidenheim.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Bayern München beat 1. FC Heidenheim 0-4 at Voith-Arena, Regular Season - 30, in the Bundesliga. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting 1. FC Heidenheim 0.83 xG and Bayern München 2.07 xG, a combined 2.91. The scoreboard read 0-4 for 4 actual goals. 1. FC Heidenheim fell 0.8 short of their projected output. Bayern München outscored their 2.07 projection by 1.9. Those figures were built on strength ratings of 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.71 / defence 1.12 against Bayern München attack 1.30 / defence 0.79, drawn from 63/63 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it 1. FC Heidenheim 14% | Draw 21% | Bayern München 66%, with Bayern München to win its most likely call at 66%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. Over 3.5 was 33% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 50% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 67% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (1. FC Heidenheim 54%, Bayern München 79%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

1. FC Heidenheim's trading profile (63 games, 31 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Bayern München's trading profile (63 games, 31 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Bayern München arrived the stronger side — 2.24 PPG against 1.02. That form edge translated into the three points. 1. FC Heidenheim (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.35 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 1.65 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Bayern München (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 2.45 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.48 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The numbers read this fixture well — the outcome largely followed the script the data laid out beforehand.

💡 Key Insights