🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at FC Augsburg's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at WWK Arena, Regular Season - 15, as FC Augsburg and Werder Bremen drew 0-0 in the Bundesliga. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting FC Augsburg 1.60 xG and Werder Bremen 1.65 xG, a combined 3.24. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. FC Augsburg fell 1.6 short of their projected output. Werder Bremen landed 1.6 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of FC Augsburg attack 0.82 / defence 1.13 against Werder Bremen attack 1.03 / defence 1.14, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it FC Augsburg 37% | Draw 24% | Werder Bremen 39%, with Werder Bremen to win its most likely call at 39%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 84% and missed. Over 3.5 was 41% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (FC Augsburg 56%, Werder Bremen 65%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

FC Augsburg's trading profile (48 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Werder Bremen's trading profile (48 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — FC Augsburg 1.17 PPG, Werder Bremen 1.40 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. FC Augsburg (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.12 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.46 average — tighter than their form line. Werder Bremen (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.79 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.96 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights