🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as 1. FC Magdeburg edge out Dynamo Dresden 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

1. FC Magdeburg beat Dynamo Dresden 1-2 at Rudolf-Harbig-Stadion, Regular Season - 2, in the 2. Bundesliga. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Dynamo Dresden 1.36 xG and 1. FC Magdeburg 1.52 xG, a combined 2.88. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Dynamo Dresden attack 0.86 / defence 1.15 against 1. FC Magdeburg attack 1.06 / defence 0.95, drawn from 1/35 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Dynamo Dresden 34% | Draw 25% | 1. FC Magdeburg 41%, with 1. FC Magdeburg to win its most likely call at 41%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Dynamo Dresden 100%, 1. FC Magdeburg 0%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Dynamo Dresden 0.00 PPG, 1. FC Magdeburg 0.00 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the 1. FC Magdeburg win broke the near-deadlock. Dynamo Dresden managed 1 against a 2.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 2 against a 3.00 average — tighter than their form line. 1. FC Magdeburg scored 2 against a 0.00 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A strong night for the model: the result sat comfortably inside what the pre-match data projected.

💡 Key Insights