🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates RED Star FC 93 at 42%, yet other data sources diverge — this RED Star FC 93 vs PAU fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Ligue 2 encounter, Regular Season - 22 sees PAU travel to Stade Bauer to take on RED Star FC 93. The game is scheduled for Friday 6 February 2026, 19:00 UTC.

Form Guide

RED Star FC 93 — All Games: 3W 5D 2L from 10 Ligue 2 outings this season, averaging 1.40 points per game. Last five: D L W D D. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for RED Star FC 93, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, RED Star FC 93 have posted 3W 5D 2L at Stade Bauer — 1.40 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Ligue 2 games this season, PAU have recorded 2W 4D 4L from 10 outings — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L D L D W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for PAU, so this record blends games from this season and last.

PAU's form when playing away from home: 4W 4D 2L across 10 road games this term (1.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.60 exceeds their overall 1.00 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — RED Star FC 93 at 1.40 PPG versus PAU's 1.00. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. RED Star FC 93 register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant matches, PAU in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for RED Star FC 93, 2 for PAU and 0 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 3 meetings have averaged 4.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 12 Sep 2025, ended 3–0 with RED Star FC 93 winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

RED Star FC 93 in-play tendencies (54 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

PAU in-play tendencies (54 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 35%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RED Star FC 93 52% versus PAU 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RED Star FC 93 48% | PAU 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RED Star FC 93 1.44 xG and PAU 1.25 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RED Star FC 93 attack 1.022 / defence 1.086 | PAU attack 0.990 / defence 1.204. League average goals — home 1.172 / away 1.163. PAU bring a strong defensive rating of 1.204 — this is suppressing RED Star FC 93's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 54 RED Star FC 93 games / 55 PAU games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RED Star FC 93 42% | Draw 26% | PAU 33%. Fair-value odds: RED Star FC 93 2.38 | Draw 3.85 | PAU 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 50% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.69. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 50%/50% — the total xG of 2.69 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, RED Star FC 93 are the pick at 42% — marginal model lean. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on RED Star FC 93 offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.69 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 50% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.0 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 55%. Form rates corroborate: RED Star FC 93 70% | PAU 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights