Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Prediction vindicated as Amiens edge out Nancy 0-1.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Amiens beat Nancy 0-1 at Stade Marcel Picot, Regular Season - 10, in the Ligue 2. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Nancy 1.18 xG and Amiens 1.50 xG, a combined 2.68. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Nancy fell 1.2 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Nancy attack 0.73 / defence 0.99 against Amiens attack 1.17 / defence 1.33, drawn from 9/43 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Nancy 30% | Draw 26% | Amiens 44%, with Amiens to win its most likely call at 44%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 50%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Nancy 56%, Amiens 44%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 44%, which matched the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Nancy's trading profile (9 games, 4 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 44% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Amiens's trading profile (9 games, 4 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Nancy 1.33 PPG, Amiens 1.00 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Amiens win broke the near-deadlock. Amiens (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.25 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.00 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.