Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Guingamp and Nancy share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Guingamp and Nancy finished level at 2-2 at Stade de Roudourou, Regular Season - 9, in the Ligue 2. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Guingamp 1.46 xG and Nancy 1.39 xG, a combined 2.85. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Guingamp attack 1.12 / defence 1.21 against Nancy attack 0.92 / defence 1.02, drawn from 42/8 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Guingamp 39% | Draw 25% | Nancy 36%, with Guingamp to win its most likely call at 39%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. Over 3.5 was 32% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Guingamp 75%, Nancy 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Guingamp's trading profile (8 games, 4 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.
Nancy's trading profile (8 games, 4 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 38% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Guingamp 1.62 PPG, Nancy 1.38 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.