🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Dunkerque run riot with a 3-0 hammering of Clermont Foot.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Dunkerque beat Clermont Foot 3-0 at Stade Marcel-Tribut, Regular Season - 24, in the Ligue 2. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Dunkerque 1.43 xG and Clermont Foot 0.82 xG, a combined 2.25. The scoreboard read 3-0 for 3 actual goals. Dunkerque beat their projection by 1.6 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Clermont Foot landed 0.8 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Dunkerque attack 0.97 / defence 0.89 against Clermont Foot attack 0.84 / defence 1.20, drawn from 61/23 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Dunkerque 52% | Draw 27% | Clermont Foot 21%, with Dunkerque to win its most likely call at 52%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 39%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 66% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 42% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 40% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Dunkerque 39%, Clermont Foot 42%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 47%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Dunkerque's trading profile (57 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not.

Clermont Foot's trading profile (57 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 44% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Dunkerque arrived the stronger side — 1.47 PPG against 0.88. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Dunkerque (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.11 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.32 average — tighter than their form line. Clermont Foot (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.71 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights