🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Clermont Foot at 38% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Clermont Foot vs Estac Troyes encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Ligue 2 encounter, Regular Season - 2 sees Estac Troyes travel to Stade Gabriel Montpied to take on Clermont Foot. The game is scheduled for Friday 15 August 2025, 19:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Clermont Foot stand at 2W 5D 3L from 10 Ligue 2 matches — 1.10 PPG. Last five: W D W L D. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. Clermont Foot have played only a handful of Ligue 2 games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Clermont Foot's form when playing at home: 1W 5D 4L across 10 games at Stade Gabriel Montpied this term (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.80 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Across all Ligue 2 games this season, Estac Troyes have recorded 5W 2D 3L from 10 outings — 1.70 PPG. Last five: W W L W W. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 0.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Estac Troyes have played only a handful of Ligue 2 games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Estac Troyes away from home this season: 4W 0D 6L from 10 away games — 1.20 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 1.20 is notably below their overall 1.70 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Form points away from home here. Estac Troyes's 1.70 PPG return is 0.60 points per game ahead of Clermont Foot's 1.10 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 6 previous encounters have yielded 4 wins for Clermont Foot, 2 for Estac Troyes and 0 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 18 Apr 2025, ended 0–2 with Estac Troyes winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Profile

Clermont Foot in-play tendencies (35 games, 17 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 24% of games (home games); they fail to score in 40% of games.

Estac Troyes in-play tendencies (35 games, 17 at away): they score before half-time in 76% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 35% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time; they fail to score in 43% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Clermont Foot 54% versus Estac Troyes 26%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Clermont Foot 37% | Estac Troyes 49%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Clermont Foot 1.31 xG and Estac Troyes 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Clermont Foot attack 0.914 / defence 1.012 | Estac Troyes attack 1.000 / defence 0.943. League average goals — home 1.525 / away 1.226. Data: 35 Clermont Foot games / 35 Estac Troyes games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Clermont Foot 38% | Draw 28% | Estac Troyes 34%. Fair-value odds: Clermont Foot 2.63 | Draw 3.57 | Estac Troyes 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.56. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.56 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

Clermont Foot dominate the H2H record, yet Estac Troyes are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

The Poisson model's primary lean is Clermont Foot at 38% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Estac Troyes (1.70 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 28% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Clermont Foot offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.56 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 47% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.2 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 53%. Form rates are neutral: Clermont Foot 60% | Estac Troyes 40%.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (35 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights