🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Le Havre at 37%, yet other data sources diverge — this Metz vs Le Havre fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Metz host Le Havre at Stade Saint-Symphorien in Ligue 1, Regular Season - 6. Kick-off is scheduled for Sunday 28 September 2025 at 16:15 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Metz stand at 3W 3D 4L from 10 Ligue 1 matches — 1.20 PPG. Last five: L L L D L. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 2.00 conceded. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Metz have played only a handful of Ligue 1 games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

At home at Stade Saint-Symphorien, Metz have gone 4W 4D 2L this season (10 games, 1.60 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Ligue 1 games this season, Le Havre have recorded 3W 2D 5L from 10 outings — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L L W L D. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. Le Havre have played only a handful of Ligue 1 games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Le Havre's form when playing away from home: 5W 1D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.60 PPG). They are averaging 1.80 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.60 exceeds their overall 1.10 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Metz at 1.20 PPG versus Le Havre's 1.10. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for Metz, 1 for Le Havre and 2 shared spoils from 4 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.2 per contest from 4 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 21 Apr 2024, ended 1–0 with Metz winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.2 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Metz in-play tendencies (39 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

Le Havre in-play tendencies (39 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 60% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 38%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Metz 59% and Le Havre 64% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Metz 56% | Le Havre 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Metz 1.22 xG and Le Havre 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Metz attack 0.708 / defence 1.083 | Le Havre attack 0.951 / defence 0.999. League average goals — home 1.723 / away 1.199. Metz's attack strength of 0.708 is below the league average — the 1.22 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 5 Metz games / 39 Le Havre games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Metz 36% | Draw 27% | Le Havre 37%. Fair-value odds: Metz 2.78 | Draw 3.70 | Le Havre 2.70. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 44% | BTTS probability 50% | Total xG 2.45. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 56% — total xG of 2.45 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 50% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Le Havre are the pick at 37% — marginal model lean. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Le Havre offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.45 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 44% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by H2H averaging 1.2 goals per meeting — though form averaging only 3.3 goals per game points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 50% on No. This conflicts with form data: Metz 70% | Le Havre 80% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights