🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at VPS's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

VPS and Gnistan finished level at 0-0 at Lemonsoft Stadion, Regular Season - 11, in the Veikkausliiga. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting VPS 1.48 xG and Gnistan 1.31 xG, a combined 2.79. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. VPS fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Gnistan landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of VPS attack 0.96 / defence 0.90 against Gnistan attack 0.94 / defence 1.13, drawn from 32/32 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it VPS 41% | Draw 25% | Gnistan 33%, with VPS to win its most likely call at 41%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 53%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 77% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 63% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (VPS 64%, Gnistan 61%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 65%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

VPS's trading profile (31 games, 15 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 71% of their matches — today it did not.

Gnistan's trading profile (31 games, 15 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — VPS 1.55 PPG, Gnistan 1.35 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. VPS (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.53 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.47 average — tighter than their form line. Gnistan (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.73 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.93 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights