🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Gnistan cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over Mariehamn.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gnistan beat Mariehamn 2-0 at Mustapekka Areena, Regular Season - 5, in the Veikkausliiga. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gnistan 1.65 xG and Mariehamn 1.49 xG, a combined 3.14. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. Mariehamn landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gnistan attack 0.95 / defence 1.03 against Mariehamn attack 0.93 / defence 1.15, drawn from 26/27 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gnistan 42% | Draw 24% | Mariehamn 35%, with Gnistan to win its most likely call at 42%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 61% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gnistan 61%, Mariehamn 61%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gnistan's trading profile (31 games, 15 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not.

Mariehamn's trading profile (31 games, 15 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 45% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 42% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gnistan 1.35 PPG, Mariehamn 1.10 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gnistan win broke the near-deadlock. Gnistan (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.20 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.13 average — tighter than their form line. Mariehamn (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.80 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights