🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant HJK Helsinki run riot with a 0-3 hammering of FF Jaro.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

HJK Helsinki beat FF Jaro 0-3 at Jakobstads Centralplan, Regular Season - 6, in the Veikkausliiga. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting FF Jaro 1.31 xG and HJK Helsinki 1.87 xG, a combined 3.18. The scoreboard read 0-3 for 3 actual goals. FF Jaro fell 1.3 short of their projected output. HJK Helsinki outscored their 1.87 projection by 1.1. Those figures were built on strength ratings of FF Jaro attack 0.89 / defence 1.35 against HJK Helsinki attack 0.91 / defence 0.93, drawn from 5/27 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it FF Jaro 27% | Draw 23% | HJK Helsinki 51%, with HJK Helsinki to win its most likely call at 51%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 83% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 0% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (FF Jaro 0%, HJK Helsinki 0%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 0%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Form vs Result

On form, FF Jaro arrived the stronger side — 1.50 PPG against 0.00. Form was overturned, with HJK Helsinki winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. FF Jaro managed 0 against a 1.00 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 0.50 concession average — a leakier day than usual. HJK Helsinki scored 3 against a 0.00 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights