Sign in Register

EIF 1-2 Haka – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Veikkausliiga · Regular Season - 18

Kick-off

Sun 4 Aug 2024

16:30

Venue

Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN

Competition

Veikkausliiga

Finland

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Haka at 61% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this EIF vs Haka encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN plays host to EIF versus Haka in Veikkausliiga, Regular Season - 18. Kick-off: Sunday 4 August 2024 at 16:30 UTC.

Form

EIF (all games): 3W 0D 7L across 10 Veikkausliiga fixtures this term — 0.90 PPG. Last five: W W L L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 2.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.50 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for EIF, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN, EIF have gone 1W 2D 5L this season (8 games, 0.62 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.75 goals scored and 2.12 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 62% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Haka have collected 1.60 PPG across 10 Veikkausliiga outings this season: 5W 1D 4L. Last five: L W W L L. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 1.50. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for Haka, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Haka's away record: 3W 2D 5L from 10 road trips in Veikkausliiga this season (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 1.10 is notably below their overall 1.60 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

On a straight form reading, Haka are the stronger side — 0.70 PPG clear of the hosts (1.60 vs 0.90). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: EIF 0W, Haka 1W, 0D.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 1 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 12 Apr 2024, ended 1–2 with Haka winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

EIF goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (17 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

Haka goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (17 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 100% of fixtures in away games; they lead at the break 53% of the time; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — EIF 71% and Haka 53% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (EIF 65% | Haka 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects EIF 0.93 xG and Haka 1.97 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: EIF attack 0.606 / defence 1.476 | Haka attack 0.907 / defence 0.952. League average goals — home 1.607 / away 1.474. EIF's attack strength of 0.606 is below the league average — the 0.93 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 17 EIF games / 39 Haka games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: EIF 16% | Draw 23% | Haka 61%. Fair-value odds: EIF 6.25 | Draw 4.35 | Haka 1.64. The model has a clear lean to Haka (61%) — a 45pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.90. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.90 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Haka are the pick at 61% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 2.90 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 55% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 53% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: EIF 62% | Haka 50% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.90) both back Over 2.5 goals (55% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 53% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Haka lead on PPG: 1.60 vs 0.90 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Haka Poisson xG (1.97) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.20) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.90 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Haka — Haka at 61% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Haka at 61% away win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: EIF vs Haka | Competition: Veikkausliiga, Regular Season - 18 | Venue: Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN • Kick-off: Sunday 4 Aug 2024, 16:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: EIF 16% | Draw 23% | Haka 61% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 55% | BTTS 53% | xG EIF 0.93 / Haka 1.97 • Poisson strength factors: EIF attack 0.606 / def 1.476 | Haka attack 0.907 / def 0.952 | league avg home 1.607 / away 1.474 • Poisson stance: Haka (61%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

0.93

EIF xG

Expected Goals

1.97

Haka xG

16%
23%
61%
EIF Draw Haka

53%

BTTS

79%

Over 1.5

55%

Over 2.5

33%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does EIF vs Haka kick off?

EIF vs Haka kicked off at 16:30 on Sunday 4 August 2024 at Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN.

What was the final score in EIF vs Haka?

EIF 1 - 2 Haka.

Where is EIF vs Haka being played?

The match is being played at Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN.

What competition is EIF vs Haka part of?

EIF vs Haka is a Regular Season - 18 fixture in the Veikkausliiga (Finland).

Who is favourite to win EIF vs Haka?

Our statistical model gives EIF a 16% chance of winning, Haka a 61% chance, and a 23% chance of a draw — making Haka the favourite.

Will both teams score in EIF vs Haka?

Our model estimates a 53% probability that both EIF and Haka will score (BTTS).

Will EIF vs Haka have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 55%.

What is the head-to-head record between EIF and Haka?

Record (1 meetings): EIF 0W | Draws 0 | Haka 1W.

What form are EIF and Haka in?

EIF (all comps): 3W-0D-7L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 2.50 | L5 W-W-L-L-L. Haka (all comps): 5W-1D-4L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.50 | L5 L-W-W-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from EIF's attack rating (0.61) and Haka's defence rating (0.95), the model arrives at 0.93 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Haka's attack (0.91x) against EIF's defence (1.48x) — and the away total comes out at 1.97.

These ratings are built from 17/39 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.4%. Close behind: 0-2 (10.7%), 1-2 (9.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 32% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Haka Win

16%

EIF

6.17

23%

Draw

4.38

61%

Haka

1.64

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 1

10.9%

Away win

Most likely

0 – 2

10.7%

Away win

1 – 1

10.1%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.93

EIF xG

Total xG

2.90

1.97

Haka xG

16%
23%
61%
EIFDrawHaka

6.17

16%

Home win

4.38

23%

Draw

1.64

61%

Away win

Goals Markets

79%

Over 1.5

1.27

21%

Under 1.5

4.76

55%

Over 2.5

1.82

45%

Under 2.5

2.22

33%

Over 3.5

3.03

67%

Under 3.5

1.49

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

53%

BTTS Yes

1.89

47%

BTTS No

2.12

Clean Sheet

14%

EIF

7.19

40%

Haka

2.52

Win to Nil

2%

EIF

44.37

24%

Haka

4.14

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.5 10.9 10.7 7.1 3.5 1.4
1 5.1 10.1 9.9 6.5 3.2 1.3
2 2.4 4.7 4.6 3.0 1.5 0.6
3 0.7 1.4 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.2
4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.926
λ Away (xG) 1.973
Total xG 2.899
League avg home goals 1.607
League avg away goals 1.474
EIF attack strength 0.606
EIF defence strength 1.476
Haka attack strength 0.907
Haka defence strength 0.952
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 17 / 39

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for EIF vs Haka?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.4%.

How many goals are EIF and Haka expected to score?

The model projects 0.93 expected goals for EIF and 1.97 for Haka, a combined total of 2.90.

How confident is the prediction model for EIF vs Haka?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 61%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 17 outings, EIF have picked up 0.71 PPG on a 3W 3D 11L record — W-W-L-L-L across the most recent five. The sample for EIF is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Haka's form line: 8W 3D 6L from 17 games, 1.59 PPG, last five L-W-W-L-L. The sample for Haka is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Haka are the form team by 0.88 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against EIF.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, EIF have posted 0.62 PPG from 8 outings (1W 2D 5L).

On the road, Haka have gone 3W 1D 4L from 8 away games — 1.25 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Haka come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

EIF are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 2.12 conceded per game recently; Haka are on 1.59 scored and 1.47 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: EIF have seen both teams score in 71% of their recent games.

Defensively: Haka in 35% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 17 Results — Veikkausliiga

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

EIF

EIF

Blended
W W L L L
Haka

Haka

Blended
L W W L L
17 Played 17
3/3/11 W / D / L 8/3/6
0.71 Points Per Game 1.59
1.00 Avg Goals Scored 1.59
2.12 Avg Goals Conceded 1.47
3.12 Avg Goals / Game 3.06
2 Clean Sheets 6
12 BTTS 9
11 Over 2.5 Games 10
EIF

EIF

L
H KuPS
1–2 HT 1–0
28 Jul
L
A AC Oulu
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Jul
L
H Inter Turku
0–7 HT 0–2
14 Jul
W
A VPS
3–2 HT 1–1
06 Jul
W
A Gnistan
2–1 HT 1–0
30 Jun
L
H Mariehamn
1–2 HT 1–1
19 Jun
L
A SJK
1–3 HT 1–1
12 Jun
W
H Gnistan
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
L
H VPS
1–2 HT 0–0
02 Jun
L
A KuPS
1–4 HT 1–2
26 May
D
H Lahti
1–1 HT 1–0
19 May
L
H Ilves
0–2 HT 0–1
12 May
D
A HJK Helsinki
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
L
A Inter Turku
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Apr
D
H AC Oulu
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Apr
L
A Haka
1–2 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Mariehamn
2–3 HT 2–2
06 Apr
Haka

Haka

L
H Gnistan
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Jul
L
A HJK Helsinki
0–2 HT 0–1
20 Jul
W
H Ilves
4–3 HT 1–2
15 Jul
W
A Mariehamn
3–0 HT 2–0
07 Jul
L
A SJK
1–2 HT 0–2
29 Jun
D
H Inter Turku
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Jun
W
A KuPS
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Jun
W
H Mariehamn
2–0 HT 1–0
07 Jun
L
A Inter Turku
1–3 HT 0–2
31 May
W
H AC Oulu
4–3 HT 1–0
24 May
L
A Ilves
0–5 HT 0–2
17 May
W
H SJK
2–0 HT 1–0
11 May
W
A Gnistan
3–0 HT 2–0
05 May
D
H HJK Helsinki
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Apr
D
A Lahti
1–1 HT 1–0
20 Apr
W
H EIF
2–1 HT 1–0
12 Apr
L
H VPS
1–2 HT 0–2
06 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are EIF and Haka in coming into this match?

EIF have gone 3W 3D 11L in their last 17 games (0.71 PPG), while Haka have gone 8W 3D 6L in their last 17 (1.59 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — EIF at home or Haka away?

Haka's away record (1.25 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — EIF at home: 0.62 PPG; Haka away: 1.25 PPG.

Have EIF or Haka been keeping clean sheets recently?

EIF have kept a clean sheet in 12% of their recent games, Haka in 35%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 2 times since April 2024 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Veikkausliiga. It has been a while since the last meeting — 4 August 2024, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

EIF

0

EIF

0

Draws

Haka

2

Haka

Recent Meetings

EIF
1–2
04 Aug 24
Haka
Haka
2–1
12 Apr 24
EIF

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between EIF and Haka?

From 2 meetings on record, EIF have won 0, Haka have won 2, and 0 have been drawn.

When did EIF and Haka last play each other?

They last met on 4 August 2024, when EIF 1-2 Haka.

Who has won more matches between EIF and Haka?

Haka have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

EIF are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 38% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Haka are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — EIF 62%, Haka 38% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 50% (EIF) and 62% (Haka). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 12% and 25% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Haka in 38%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = EIF home games / Haka away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

EIF EIF Blended
Metric All
(17 games)
Venue
(8 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 13/17
(76.5%)
6/8
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 6/17
(35.3%)
2/8
(25%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/4
(75%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/4
(50%)
1/2
(50%)
Winning at HT 4/17
(23.5%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/17
(17.6%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/17
(0%)
0/8
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 12/17
(70.6%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 11/17
(64.7%)
4/8
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 5/17
(29.4%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Clean Sheet 2/17
(11.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Failed to Score 4/17
(23.5%)
2/8
(25%)
Haka Haka Blended
Metric All
(17 games)
Venue
(8 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 16/17
(94.1%)
8/8
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 7/17
(41.2%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Winning at HT 9/17
(52.9%)
4/8
(50%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/17
(11.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/17
(5.9%)
0/8
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 9/17
(52.9%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 10/17
(58.8%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/17
(23.5%)
2/8
(25%)
Clean Sheet 6/17
(35.3%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Failed to Score 3/17
(17.6%)
2/8
(25%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when EIF play Haka?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 62% of EIF's recent matches and 38% of Haka's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is EIF vs Haka usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of EIF's matches and 62% of Haka's.

Do EIF and Haka tend to score early?

EIF have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, Haka in 100% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Haka edge out EIF 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Haka beat EIF 1-2 at Ekenäs Sparbank Arena TN, Regular Season - 18, in the Veikkausliiga. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting EIF 0.93 xG and Haka 1.97 xG, a combined 2.90. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of EIF attack 0.61 / defence 1.48 against Haka attack 0.91 / defence 0.95, drawn from 17/39 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it EIF 16% | Draw 23% | Haka 61%, with Haka to win its most likely call at 61%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 53% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (EIF 65%, Haka 59%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

EIF's trading profile (17 games, 8 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 71% of their matches — today it did.

Haka's trading profile (17 games, 8 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Haka arrived the stronger side — 1.59 PPG against 0.71. The form guide was vindicated by the result.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The data earned its keep here, calling the bulk of the fixture correctly.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 55% Over 2.5 probability, 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 53% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 62% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.