🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Shrewsbury's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Shrewsbury and Barnet finished level at 0-0 at The Croud Meadow, Regular Season - 30, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Shrewsbury 0.83 xG and Barnet 1.04 xG, a combined 1.88. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Shrewsbury fell 0.8 short of their projected output. Barnet landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Shrewsbury attack 0.74 / defence 1.10 against Barnet attack 0.78 / defence 0.88, drawn from 27/27 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Shrewsbury 29% | Draw 32% | Barnet 40%, with Barnet to win its most likely call at 40%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 32%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 29%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 56% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 37% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 44% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Shrewsbury 48%, Barnet 41%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Shrewsbury's trading profile (27 games, 13 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 37% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Barnet's trading profile (27 games, 13 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Barnet arrived the stronger side — 1.52 PPG against 0.81. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Shrewsbury (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.85 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.15 average — tighter than their form line. Barnet (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.08 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.85 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights