🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates AFC Wimbledon at 34% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Notts County vs AFC Wimbledon encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a League Two clash, Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals as Notts County welcome AFC Wimbledon to Meadow Lane. Kick-off is set for Saturday 10 May 2025 at 20:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Notts County — All Games: 3W 2D 5L from 10 League Two outings this season, averaging 1.10 points per game. Last five: L D L W L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Notts County's form when playing at home: 3W 2D 5L across 10 games at Meadow Lane this term (1.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all League Two games this season, AFC Wimbledon have recorded 3W 4D 3L from 10 outings — 1.30 PPG. Last five: D D L L W. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

AFC Wimbledon's form when playing away from home: 2W 5D 3L across 10 road games this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Notts County at 1.10 PPG versus AFC Wimbledon's 1.30. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 4 previous meetings, Notts County have won 1, AFC Wimbledon 3, with 0 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.8 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 8 Mar 2025, ended 0–2 with AFC Wimbledon winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Patterns

Notts County in-play and half-time data (92 games, 46 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (home games).

AFC Wimbledon in-play and half-time data (92 games, 46 at away): they score before half-time in 46% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 74% of the time; BTTS occurs in 39% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 30% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 40% of the time; they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Notts County 60% versus AFC Wimbledon 39%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Notts County 60% | AFC Wimbledon 35%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Notts County 0.93 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.96 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Notts County attack 0.963 / defence 1.055 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.801 / defence 0.755. League average goals — home 1.284 / away 1.139. AFC Wimbledon's defence strength of 0.755 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 92 Notts County games / 92 AFC Wimbledon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Notts County 33% | Draw 33% | AFC Wimbledon 34%. Fair-value odds: Notts County 3.03 | Draw 3.03 | AFC Wimbledon 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 33% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 30% | BTTS probability 38% | Total xG 1.90. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 70% probability — total xG of 1.90 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 38% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is AFC Wimbledon at 34% — marginal model lean. With a 33% draw probability, Draw No Bet on AFC Wimbledon offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 1.90 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 30% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 2.0 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 2.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 38% on No. This conflicts with form data: Notts County 70% | AFC Wimbledon 50% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights