🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Grimsby and Gillingham share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Blundell Park, Regular Season - 29, as Grimsby and Gillingham drew 1-1 in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Grimsby 1.38 xG and Gillingham 1.07 xG, a combined 2.45. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Grimsby attack 1.13 / defence 1.22 against Gillingham attack 0.76 / defence 0.94, drawn from 73/71 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Grimsby 43% | Draw 29% | Gillingham 28%, with Grimsby to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 44%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 71% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 50% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 44% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Grimsby 54%, Gillingham 35%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Grimsby's trading profile (71 games, 35 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did.

Gillingham's trading profile (71 games, 35 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 39% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Grimsby 1.21 PPG, Gillingham 1.34 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Grimsby (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 1.80 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights