Grimsby 0-0 AFC Wimbledon – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Grimsby at 41% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Blundell Park plays host to Grimsby versus AFC Wimbledon in League Two (matchday 1). Kick-off: Saturday 5 August 2023 at 16:00 UK time.
Current Form
Grimsby's record over their last 10 games: 4W 2D 4L (1.40 PPG). Last five: W L W L W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings (30%).
Grimsby's form when playing at home: 4W 5D 1L across their last 10 home games (1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from their last 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at home.
AFC Wimbledon (all games): 1W 2D 7L across their last 10 — 0.50 points per game. Last five: L L L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
AFC Wimbledon's away record over their last 10 away games: 0W 4D 6L (0.40 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.
The points-per-game gap of 0.90 in Grimsby's favour (1.40 vs 0.50) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.
H2H History
The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 2 H2H matches in our data, the wins are level at 1 apiece, with 0 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 2 H2H matches to go on, treat this as a light input.
Scoring has been limited in the 2 H2H matches in our data, averaging 1.0 goals per game, which makes Under 2.5 the head-to-head-backed angle in the goals market. The most recent of those, on 8 May 2023, ended Grimsby 1–0 AFC Wimbledon — a Grimsby win.
With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game, the H2H data points toward a tight, low-scoring contest — Under 2.5 is the stronger head-to-head angle regardless of which side wins.
Trading
Grimsby half-time and goal-timing data (last 46 games, 23 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 65% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; of the 12 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 42%; of the 14 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 36%; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 35% of games (home games).
AFC Wimbledon half-time and goal-timing data (last 46 games, 23 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 65% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 59% of the time; of the 13 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 54%; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games); they fail to score in 33% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Grimsby 50% versus AFC Wimbledon 52%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Grimsby 39% | AFC Wimbledon 44%). Note also that AFC Wimbledon surrender HT leads in 54% of cases while Grimsby recover from half-time deficits to draw or win 36% of the time — a dynamic that could influence in-play positioning.
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Grimsby 1.24 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.99 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Grimsby attack 0.936 / defence 0.969 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.945 / defence 1.014. League average goals — home 1.302 / away 1.087. Data: built from Grimsby's last 46 games and AFC Wimbledon's last 46. Some of those games are older results, so treat these probabilities as directional rather than precise.
Result probabilities: Grimsby 41% | Draw 31% | AFC Wimbledon 29%. Fair-value odds: Grimsby 2.46 | Draw 3.24 | AFC Wimbledon 3.50. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 39% | BTTS Yes probability 46% | Total xG 2.23. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 61% — total xG of 2.23 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS No at 54% is only a slight lean — the model gives both sides a fair chance of scoring, so No isn't a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Grimsby at 41% — marginal model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 31% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Grimsby if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
The Poisson model projects 2.23 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 61% — reasonable conviction, supported by recent form (Grimsby's last 10 home games and AFC Wimbledon's last 10 away games) averaging 2.0 goals per game.
Poisson assigns a 54% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral — both teams scored in: Grimsby 50% (last 10 home games) | AFC Wimbledon 60% (last 10 away games).
The Poisson model's sample (Grimsby 46 games, AFC Wimbledon 46) includes some older results, so its projections carry extra uncertainty — weight recent form and the odds accordingly.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon | Competition: League Two, matchday 1 | Venue: Blundell Park • Kick-off: Saturday 5 August 2023 at 16:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Grimsby 41% | Draw 31% | AFC Wimbledon 29% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 39% (Under 61%) | BTTS Yes 46% (No 54%) | xG Grimsby 1.24 / AFC Wimbledon 0.99 • Poisson strength factors: Grimsby attack 0.936 / def 0.969 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.945 / def 1.014 | league avg home 1.302 / away 1.087 • Poisson stance: Grimsby (41%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.24
Grimsby xG
Expected Goals
0.99
AFC Wimbledon xG
46%
BTTS
66%
Over 1.5
39%
Over 2.5
19%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon FAQs
What time does Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon kick off?
Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon kicked off at 16:00 UK time on Saturday 5 August 2023 at Blundell Park.
What was the final score in Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?
Grimsby 0 - 0 AFC Wimbledon.
Where is Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon being played?
The match is being played at Blundell Park.
What competition is Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon part of?
Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon is a League Two fixture (matchday 1) (England).
Who is favourite to win Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?
Our statistical model gives Grimsby a 41% chance of winning, AFC Wimbledon a 29% chance, and a 31% chance of a draw — making Grimsby the favourite.
Will both teams score in Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?
Our model estimates a 46% probability that both Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon will score, so it leans towards BTTS No (54%).
Will Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 39%, so it leans towards under 2.5 goals (61%).
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Grimsby's attacking strength (0.94x league average) is weighed against AFC Wimbledon's defensive record (1.01x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.24. Flip it around — AFC Wimbledon's attack (0.94x) against Grimsby's defence (0.97x) — and the away total comes out at 0.99.
These ratings are built from Grimsby's last 46 games and AFC Wimbledon's last 46, which are mostly older results — treat them as a rough guide.
Most Likely Scorelines
The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 14.9%. Close behind: 0-0 (12.5%), 1-0 (11.6%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 39% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Grimsby Win
41%
2.46
31%
3.24
29%
3.50
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 0
13.3%
Home win
Most likely
1 β 1
13.2%
Draw
0 β 0
10.7%
Draw
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.24
Grimsby xG
Total xG
2.23
0.99
AFC Wimbledon xG
2.46
41%
Home win
3.24
31%
Draw
3.50
29%
Away win
Goals Markets
65%
Over 1.5
1.54
35%
Under 1.5
2.86
39%
Over 2.5
2.56
61%
Under 2.5
1.64
19%
Over 3.5
5.26
81%
Under 3.5
1.23
8%
Over 4.5
12.50
92%
Under 4.5
1.09
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
46%
BTTS Yes
2.18
54%
BTTS No
1.85
Clean Sheet
37%
2.70
29%
3.44
Win to Nil
15%
6.67
8%
12.06
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 13.3 | 13.2 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | – |
| 4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | – | – |
| 5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.9%.
How many goals are Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon expected to score?
The model projects 1.24 expected goals for Grimsby and 0.99 for AFC Wimbledon, a combined total of 2.23.
How confident is the prediction model for Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 41%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Across their last 46 outings, Grimsby have picked up 1.33 PPG on a 16W 13D 17L record — W-L-W-L-W across the most recent five.
AFC Wimbledon's form line: 11W 15D 20L from 46 games, 1.04 PPG, last five L-L-L-D-L.
There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.33 PPG for Grimsby against 1.04 for AFC Wimbledon. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.
Home & Away Splits
On home soil, Grimsby have posted 1.35 PPG from their last 23 home games (7W 10D 6L).
On the road, AFC Wimbledon have gone 4W 8D 11L from their last 23 away games — 0.87 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Grimsby come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Grimsby are averaging 1.07 goals scored and 1.22 conceded per game recently; AFC Wimbledon are on 1.04 scored and 1.30 conceded.
Last 46 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Grimsby
Pre-Season
AFC Wimbledon
Pre-Season
Grimsby (Home) vs AFC Wimbledon (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
Grimsby
Pre-Season
AFC Wimbledon
Pre-Season
❓ Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon Form FAQs
What form are Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon in coming into this match?
Grimsby have gone 16W 13D 17L in their last 46 games (1.33 PPG), while AFC Wimbledon have gone 11W 15D 20L in their last 46 (1.04 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Grimsby at home or AFC Wimbledon away?
Grimsby's home record (1.35 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Grimsby at home: 1.35 PPG; AFC Wimbledon away: 0.87 PPG.
Have Grimsby or AFC Wimbledon been keeping clean sheets recently?
Grimsby have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, AFC Wimbledon in 30%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
We have 6 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to December 2022 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in League Two. The most recent in our data was on 3 May 2025, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Records & Recent Trends
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Grimsby have gone 1W 1D 1L from the 3 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against AFC Wimbledon — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 6 Meetings
2
Grimsby
2
Draws
2
AFC Wimbledon
Recent Meetings
❓ Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon?
Across the 6 head-to-head matches in our data, Grimsby have won 2, AFC Wimbledon have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.
When did Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 3 May 2025: Grimsby 0-1 AFC Wimbledon.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Grimsby are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 33% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 25% of those situations.
AFC Wimbledon are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 50% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Grimsby 56%, AFC Wimbledon 56% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 35% (Grimsby) and 52% (AFC Wimbledon).
On the defensive side: Grimsby keep a clean sheet in 39% of their matches; AFC Wimbledon in 30%; AFC Wimbledon in 35%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Grimsby home games / AFC Wimbledon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of Grimsby's games and 56% of AFC Wimbledon's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon matches usually high-scoring?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 35% of Grimsby's recent games and 52% of AFC Wimbledon's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 65% of Grimsby's recent matches and 65% of AFC Wimbledon's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Stalemate at Grimsby's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
The points were shared at Blundell Park, Regular Season - 1, as Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon drew 0-0 in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Grimsby 1.24 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.99 xG, a combined 2.23. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Grimsby fell 1.2 short of their projected output. AFC Wimbledon landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Grimsby attack 0.94 / defence 0.97 against AFC Wimbledon attack 0.94 / defence 1.01, drawn from 46/46 games (PrevSeason).
On the result, the model split it Grimsby 41% | Draw 31% | AFC Wimbledon 29%, with Grimsby to win its most likely call at 41%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 39%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 66% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Grimsby 39%, AFC Wimbledon 44%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Grimsby's trading profile (46 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.
AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (46 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Grimsby 1.33 PPG, AFC Wimbledon 1.04 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Grimsby (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.04 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.09 average — tighter than their form line. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.96 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.30 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.