🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shock result as Gillingham defy the odds to beat Shrewsbury 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gillingham beat Shrewsbury 1-0 at Priestfield Stadium, Regular Season - 46, in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gillingham 1.37 xG and Shrewsbury 1.38 xG, a combined 2.75. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Shrewsbury landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gillingham attack 0.92 / defence 1.48 against Shrewsbury attack 0.77 / defence 1.15, drawn from 91/45 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gillingham 37% | Draw 26% | Shrewsbury 37%, with Gillingham to win its most likely call at 37%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 52%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 76% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 42% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gillingham 37%, Shrewsbury 46%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gillingham's trading profile (91 games, 45 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not.

Shrewsbury's trading profile (91 games, 45 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 41% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gillingham 1.19 PPG, Shrewsbury 0.90 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gillingham win broke the near-deadlock. Gillingham (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.24 average — tighter than their form line. Shrewsbury (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.91 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.84 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights