🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shock result as Gillingham defy the odds to beat AFC Wimbledon 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gillingham beat AFC Wimbledon 1-0 at Priestfield Stadium, Regular Season - 44, in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gillingham 0.72 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.78 xG, a combined 1.50. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gillingham attack 0.72 / defence 0.83 against AFC Wimbledon attack 0.84 / defence 0.76, drawn from 89/89 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gillingham 29% | Draw 39% | AFC Wimbledon 33%, with the draw its most likely call at 39%. The actual Gillingham win had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 19%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 45% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 29% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 35% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gillingham 34%, AFC Wimbledon 36%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 42%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gillingham's trading profile (89 games, 44 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and duly kept one.

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (89 games, 44 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 40% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gillingham 1.29 PPG, AFC Wimbledon 1.52 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gillingham win broke the near-deadlock. Gillingham (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 0.95 average — tighter than their form line. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.98 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights