🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Colchester's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Colchester Community Stadium, Regular Season - 19, as Colchester and Gillingham drew 0-0 in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Colchester 1.57 xG and Gillingham 1.39 xG, a combined 2.96. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Colchester fell 1.6 short of their projected output. Gillingham landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Colchester attack 1.07 / defence 1.01 against Gillingham attack 1.12 / defence 1.06, drawn from 64/64 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Colchester 42% | Draw 24% | Gillingham 34%, with Colchester to win its most likely call at 42%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 57%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 79% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 59% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 33% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Colchester 34%, Gillingham 31%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Colchester's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 39% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 25% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gillingham's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Colchester 1.47 PPG, Gillingham 1.34 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Colchester (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.34 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.84 average — tighter than their form line. Gillingham (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.97 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.19 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights