🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Cheltenham and Grimsby share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at EV Charger Points Stadium, Regular Season - 34, as Cheltenham and Grimsby drew 1-1 in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cheltenham 1.68 xG and Grimsby 1.59 xG, a combined 3.27. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cheltenham attack 1.17 / defence 1.30 against Grimsby attack 1.14 / defence 1.12, drawn from 32/78 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cheltenham 40% | Draw 24% | Grimsby 36%, with Cheltenham to win its most likely call at 40%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 41% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cheltenham 49%, Grimsby 54%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cheltenham's trading profile (78 games, 39 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did.

Grimsby's trading profile (78 games, 39 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cheltenham 1.14 PPG, Grimsby 1.28 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights