🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Cheltenham edge out Gillingham 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Cheltenham beat Gillingham 2-1 at Whaddon Road, Regular Season - 29, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cheltenham 1.48 xG and Gillingham 1.00 xG, a combined 2.47. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cheltenham attack 1.07 / defence 1.13 against Gillingham attack 0.75 / defence 1.11, drawn from 87/88 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cheltenham 48% | Draw 26% | Gillingham 26%, with Cheltenham to win its most likely call at 48%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 45%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 71% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 49% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cheltenham 48%, Gillingham 34%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cheltenham's trading profile (87 games, 42 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 55% of their matches — today it did.

Gillingham's trading profile (87 games, 42 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cheltenham 1.22 PPG, Gillingham 1.21 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Cheltenham win broke the near-deadlock.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights