Sign in Register

Cheltenham 1-1 Gillingham – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 43

Kick-off

Fri 18 Apr 2025

15:00

Venue

EV Charger Points Stadium

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Cheltenham at 37%, yet in-form Gillingham provide a compelling counter-argument — this Cheltenham vs Gillingham fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A League Two encounter, Regular Season - 43 sees Gillingham travel to EV Charger Points Stadium to take on Cheltenham. The game is scheduled for Friday 18 April 2025, 15:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Cheltenham stand at 2W 2D 6L from 10 League Two matches — 0.80 PPG. Last five: L L L L W. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market.

At home at EV Charger Points Stadium, Cheltenham have gone 4W 2D 4L this season (10 games, 1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.40 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.80 — Cheltenham are significantly better at EV Charger Points Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Across all League Two games this season, Gillingham have recorded 3W 6D 1L from 10 outings — 1.50 PPG. Last five: D D D D W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 0.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Gillingham away from home this season: 0W 8D 2L from 10 away games — 0.80 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.80 is notably below their overall 1.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Gillingham are 0.70 PPG ahead (1.50 vs 0.80), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Cheltenham register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Gillingham in 80% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Cheltenham, 0 for Gillingham and 2 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 3 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.3 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 20 Dec 2024, ended 2–2 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.3 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Cheltenham trading profile (88 games, 44 at home): they score before half-time in 66% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Gillingham trading profile (88 games, 44 at away): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 79% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 32% of games (away games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Cheltenham 52% versus Gillingham 43%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Cheltenham 48% | Gillingham 34%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cheltenham 1.14 xG and Gillingham 1.07 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cheltenham attack 0.853 / defence 1.192 | Gillingham attack 0.804 / defence 1.001. League average goals — home 1.335 / away 1.120. Data: 42 Cheltenham games / 88 Gillingham games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Cheltenham 37% | Draw 30% | Gillingham 33%. Fair-value odds: Cheltenham 2.70 | Draw 3.33 | Gillingham 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 38% | BTTS probability 45% | Total xG 2.21. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 62% — total xG of 2.21 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 45% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Cheltenham as the most likely outcome at 37% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Gillingham (1.50 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Cheltenham offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.21 combined xG gives a 38% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration — though H2H averaging only 3.3 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

Poisson assigns a 45% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Cheltenham 60% | Gillingham 80% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–2D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Form Gillingham lead on PPG: 1.50 vs 0.80 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Cheltenham Poisson xG (1.14) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.40) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Form (PPG) favours Gillingham but Poisson leans Cheltenham (37%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 30% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 38% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Cheltenham vs Gillingham | Competition: League Two, Regular Season - 43 | Venue: EV Charger Points Stadium • Kick-off: Friday 18 Apr 2025, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Cheltenham 37% | Draw 30% | Gillingham 33% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 38% | BTTS 45% | xG Cheltenham 1.14 / Gillingham 1.07 • Poisson strength factors: Cheltenham attack 0.853 / def 1.192 | Gillingham attack 0.804 / def 1.001 | league avg home 1.335 / away 1.120 • Poisson stance: Cheltenham (37%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.14

Cheltenham xG

Expected Goals

1.07

Gillingham xG

37%
30%
33%
Cheltenham Draw Gillingham

45%

BTTS

65%

Over 1.5

38%

Over 2.5

18%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Cheltenham vs Gillingham kick off?

Cheltenham vs Gillingham kicked off at 15:00 on Friday 18 April 2025 at EV Charger Points Stadium.

What was the final score in Cheltenham vs Gillingham?

Cheltenham 1 - 1 Gillingham.

Where is Cheltenham vs Gillingham being played?

The match is being played at EV Charger Points Stadium.

What competition is Cheltenham vs Gillingham part of?

Cheltenham vs Gillingham is a Regular Season - 43 fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win Cheltenham vs Gillingham?

Our statistical model gives Cheltenham a 37% chance of winning, Gillingham a 33% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making Cheltenham the favourite.

Will both teams score in Cheltenham vs Gillingham?

Our model estimates a 45% probability that both Cheltenham and Gillingham will score (BTTS).

Will Cheltenham vs Gillingham have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 38%.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheltenham and Gillingham?

Record (3 meetings): Cheltenham 1W | Draws 2 | Gillingham 0W.

What form are Cheltenham and Gillingham in?

Cheltenham (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.80 | L5 L-L-L-L-W. Gillingham (all comps): 3W-6D-1L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 0.90 | L5 D-D-D-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Cheltenham's attacking strength (0.85x league average) is weighed against Gillingham's defensive record (1.00x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.14. The same calculation in reverse, Gillingham's attack versus Cheltenham's defence, projects 1.07 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 42/88 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 15.1%. Close behind: 0-0 (12.7%), 1-0 (10.7%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 39% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Cheltenham Win

37%

Cheltenham

2.72

30%

Draw

3.35

33%

Gillingham

3.00

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

13.4%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

12.5%

Home win

0 – 1

11.7%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.14

Cheltenham xG

Total xG

2.21

1.07

Gillingham xG

37%
30%
33%
CheltenhamDrawGillingham

2.72

37%

Home win

3.35

30%

Draw

3.00

33%

Away win

Goals Markets

65%

Over 1.5

1.54

35%

Under 1.5

2.86

38%

Over 2.5

2.63

62%

Under 2.5

1.61

18%

Over 3.5

5.56

82%

Under 3.5

1.22

7%

Over 4.5

14.29

93%

Under 4.5

1.08

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

45%

BTTS Yes

2.21

55%

BTTS No

1.82

Clean Sheet

34%

Cheltenham

2.92

32%

Gillingham

3.13

Win to Nil

13%

Cheltenham

7.93

11%

Gillingham

9.38

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10.9 11.7 6.3 2.2 0.6 0.1
1 12.5 13.4 7.2 2.6 0.7 0.1
2 7.1 7.6 4.1 1.5 0.4 0.1
3 2.7 2.9 1.6 0.6 0.1
4 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2
5 0.2 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.141
λ Away (xG) 1.072
Total xG 2.213
League avg home goals 1.335
League avg away goals 1.120
Cheltenham attack strength 0.853
Cheltenham defence strength 1.192
Gillingham attack strength 0.804
Gillingham defence strength 1.001
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 42 / 88

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Cheltenham vs Gillingham?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.1%.

How many goals are Cheltenham and Gillingham expected to score?

The model projects 1.14 expected goals for Cheltenham and 1.07 for Gillingham, a combined total of 2.21.

How confident is the prediction model for Cheltenham vs Gillingham?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 37%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Cheltenham's recent record stands at 26W 19D 43L from 88 games, a 1.10 PPG return, with L-L-L-L-W in the last five.

Gillingham, meanwhile, have gone 30W 24D 34L across 88 games — 1.30 PPG, with D-D-D-D-W in their last five.

Form-wise this is close to level: Cheltenham on 1.10 PPG, Gillingham on 1.30. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Venue Form

At home specifically, Cheltenham have managed 16W 9D 19L from 44 games — 1.30 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Gillingham's away record stands at 12W 11D 21L across 44 trips, a 1.07 PPG haul.

Goals in Recent Form

Cheltenham are averaging 1.08 goals scored and 1.45 conceded per game recently; Gillingham are on 0.94 scored and 1.15 conceded.

Last 88 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Cheltenham

Cheltenham

Current Season
L L L L W
Gillingham

Gillingham

Current Season
D D D D W
88 Played 88
26/19/43 W / D / L 30/24/34
1.10 Points Per Game 1.30
1.08 Avg Goals Scored 0.94
1.45 Avg Goals Conceded 1.15
2.53 Avg Goals / Game 2.09
18 Clean Sheets 30
46 BTTS 38
42 Over 2.5 Games 30
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

W
A Crewe
3–2 HT 1–1
10 Apr
L
H Doncaster
0–2 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Morecambe
0–2 HT 0–0
01 Apr
L
A Tranmere
0–2 HT 0–1
28 Mar
L
H Milton Keynes Dons
0–1 HT 0–1
22 Mar
D
A Swindon Town
3–3 HT 1–1
15 Mar
W
A AFC Wimbledon
2–1 HT 1–1
11 Mar
L
H Colchester
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Bradford
0–3 HT 0–1
04 Mar
D
H Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Mar
D
H Walsall
2–2 HT 0–1
25 Feb
W
A Newport County
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Feb
W
H Barrow
3–2 HT 0–1
15 Feb
L
A Fleetwood Town
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Feb
W
H Chesterfield
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Feb
D
A Accrington ST
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Jan
W
H Salford City
2–1 HT 1–0
25 Jan
L
A Harrogate Town
0–2 HT 0–1
17 Jan
D
A Port Vale
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Jan
L
H Notts County
3–5 HT 1–2
29 Dec
W
H Crewe
2–1 HT 0–0
26 Dec
D
A Gillingham
2–2 HT 1–1
20 Dec
W
H Morecambe
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Dec
D
A Doncaster
2–2 HT 1–0
07 Dec
D
H Port Vale
1–1 HT 0–0
03 Dec
W
H Tranmere
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Nov
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
2–3 HT 2–1
16 Nov
D
H Bromley
1–1 HT 0–0
09 Nov
W
A Carlisle
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Oct
D
H Bradford
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Oct
W
A Colchester
2–1 HT 2–1
19 Oct
L
H Swindon Town
2–3 HT 0–2
12 Oct
L
A Barrow
1–2 HT 1–0
05 Oct
W
H Accrington ST
2–1 HT 0–1
01 Oct
L
H Fleetwood Town
0–2 HT 0–1
28 Sep
D
A Chesterfield
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Sep
L
A Salford City
1–2 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Sep
L
A Walsall
1–2 HT 0–0
31 Aug
L
H AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
A Grimsby
2–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
H Newport County
3–2 HT 2–2
10 Aug
L
A Stevenage
1–2 HT 0–1
27 Apr
W
H Peterborough
2–0 HT 2–0
23 Apr
L
H Lincoln
1–2 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Burton Albion
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Apr
L
H Bristol Rovers
1–3 HT 0–1
13 Apr
L
H Carlisle
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Apr
L
A Leyton Orient
1–3 HT 0–2
06 Apr
L
H Exeter City
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Apr
W
A Fleetwood Town
2–1 HT 1–0
29 Mar
D
A Barnsley
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Mar
L
A Oxford United
1–2 HT 0–1
09 Mar
L
H Charlton
1–3 HT 0–1
05 Mar
D
H Burton Albion
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Mar
L
A Wycombe
0–2 HT 0–0
27 Feb
D
A Wigan
1–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
W
H Port Vale
3–2 HT 1–1
17 Feb
W
H Blackpool
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Feb
W
A Cambridge United
1–0 HT 0–0
10 Feb
L
H Wycombe
1–3 HT 0–2
03 Feb
L
A Derby
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Jan
L
A Bolton
0–1 HT 0–1
23 Jan
W
H Portsmouth
2–1 HT 0–0
06 Jan
L
A Northampton
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Jan
D
H Reading
2–2 HT 2–2
29 Dec
W
H Shrewsbury
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Dec
W
A Carlisle
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Dec
L
H Leyton Orient
1–2 HT 0–0
16 Dec
D
A Bristol Rovers
1–1 HT 1–0
09 Dec
L
A Charlton
1–2 HT 1–1
28 Nov
W
H Oxford United
2–0 HT 1–0
25 Nov
D
H Wigan
1–1 HT 1–1
11 Nov
W
A Port Vale
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Oct
L
A Blackpool
2–3 HT 1–3
24 Oct
W
H Cambridge United
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Oct
D
H Derby
1–1 HT 1–1
07 Oct
L
H Fleetwood Town
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Oct
L
A Lincoln
0–2 HT 0–2
30 Sep
L
H Stevenage
0–3 HT 0–1
23 Sep
L
A Peterborough
0–3 HT 0–0
19 Sep
L
A Exeter City
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Sep
L
H Barnsley
0–2 HT 0–0
02 Sep
L
H Northampton
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Aug
D
A Portsmouth
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Aug
L
A Reading
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Aug
L
H Bolton
0–3 HT 0–3
12 Aug
L
A Shrewsbury
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Aug
Gillingham

Gillingham

W
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Apr
D
A Chesterfield
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Apr
D
A Salford City
2–2 HT 2–2
05 Apr
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Apr
D
A Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
H Walsall
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
D
A Accrington ST
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Mar
W
H Bradford
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Newport County
1–3 HT 0–3
04 Mar
W
H Morecambe
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
L
H Fleetwood Town
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Feb
D
A Carlisle
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
D
A Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Feb
L
A Barrow
0–3 HT 0–0
08 Feb
L
H Notts County
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Feb
D
A Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Jan
D
A Tranmere
1–1 HT 1–1
25 Jan
L
H Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Jan
L
H Bromley
0–3 HT 0–2
02 Jan
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Dec
L
A Colchester
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
D
H Cheltenham
2–2 HT 1–1
20 Dec
W
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Dec
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Dec
L
A Bromley
1–2 HT 0–0
04 Dec
L
H Harrogate Town
1–2 HT 0–0
23 Nov
W
H Port Vale
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Nov
D
A Swindon Town
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Oct
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–2
22 Oct
L
A Bradford
1–2 HT 1–2
19 Oct
L
H Accrington ST
1–2 HT 0–0
12 Oct
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
05 Oct
L
H Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Oct
W
H Barrow
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
A Notts County
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H Tranmere
3–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
L
A Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
07 Sep
W
H Chesterfield
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Aug
D
A Fleetwood Town
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
W
A Morecambe
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
H Carlisle
4–1 HT 1–0
10 Aug
D
H Doncaster
2–2 HT 0–2
27 Apr
L
A Mansfield Town
1–2 HT 1–0
20 Apr
W
H Barrow
3–0 HT 1–0
13 Apr
L
A Bradford
0–1 HT 0–1
06 Apr
L
A Harrogate Town
1–5 HT 1–0
01 Apr
D
H Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Mar
W
A Morecambe
3–2 HT 1–1
23 Mar
D
H Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Mar
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
D
H Tranmere
1–1 HT 0–1
09 Mar
L
A Barrow
0–2 HT 0–1
05 Mar
W
A Salford City
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
W
H Wrexham
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Feb
D
H Stockport County
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Feb
L
A Newport County
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Feb
D
H Swindon Town
2–2 HT 0–1
13 Feb
W
A Notts County
3–1 HT 2–1
09 Feb
D
H Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
03 Feb
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Jan
D
H Forest Green
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jan
W
A Accrington ST
2–1 HT 0–0
13 Jan
W
A Colchester
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Jan
W
H Sutton Utd
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Dec
L
H Crawley Town
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
D
A Forest Green
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Dec
L
H Bradford
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Dec
W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Nov
L
A Tranmere
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Nov
W
H Salford City
3–1 HT 1–1
18 Nov
L
A Wrexham
0–2 HT 0–1
11 Nov
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–2
28 Oct
W
A Swindon Town
1–0 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
H Notts County
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Oct
L
A Walsall
1–4 HT 0–2
14 Oct
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Oct
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Oct
D
H Mansfield Town
1–1 HT 1–1
30 Sep
L
A Doncaster
1–2 HT 1–1
23 Sep
W
H Morecambe
2–1 HT 2–1
16 Sep
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Sep
L
A Grimsby
0–2 HT 0–2
02 Sep
L
H Colchester
0–3 HT 0–0
26 Aug
W
A Crawley Town
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Aug
W
A Sutton Utd
1–0 HT 1–0
15 Aug
W
H Accrington ST
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Aug
W
A Stockport County
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Cheltenham and Gillingham in coming into this match?

Cheltenham have gone 26W 19D 43L in their last 88 games (1.10 PPG), while Gillingham have gone 30W 24D 34L in their last 88 (1.30 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Cheltenham at home or Gillingham away?

Cheltenham's home record (1.30 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Cheltenham at home: 1.30 PPG; Gillingham away: 1.07 PPG.

Have Cheltenham or Gillingham been keeping clean sheets recently?

Cheltenham have kept a clean sheet in 20% of their recent games, Gillingham in 34%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to November 2021. The pairing has crossed competitions too — League One, League Two all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 14 April 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Streaks & Records

Cheltenham's record when hosting Gillingham specifically: 1W 2D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

Cheltenham

2

Cheltenham

4

Draws

Gillingham

0

Gillingham

Recent Meetings

Cheltenham
2–1
14 Apr 26
Gillingham
Gillingham
1–1
11 Oct 25
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
1–1
18 Apr 25
Gillingham
Gillingham
2–2
20 Dec 24
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
2–2
15 Apr 22
Gillingham
Gillingham
0–2
23 Nov 21
Cheltenham

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Cheltenham and Gillingham?

From 6 meetings on record, Cheltenham have won 2, Gillingham have won 0, and 4 have been drawn.

When did Cheltenham and Gillingham last play each other?

They last met on 14 April 2026, when Cheltenham 2-1 Gillingham.

Who has won more matches between Cheltenham and Gillingham?

Cheltenham have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Cheltenham are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 66% of their matches.

Gillingham are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Cheltenham 52%, Gillingham 46% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 43% (Cheltenham) and 32% (Gillingham).

On the defensive side: Cheltenham have failed to score in 27% of games; Gillingham in 34%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Cheltenham home games / Gillingham away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Cheltenham Cheltenham Current Season
Metric All
(88 games)
Venue
(44 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 59/88
(67%)
29/44
(65.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/88
(26.1%)
12/44
(27.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 24/29
(82.8%)
14/15
(93.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 14/29
(48.3%)
8/15
(53.3%)
Winning at HT 18/88
(20.5%)
8/44
(18.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/88
(6.8%)
1/44
(2.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/88
(5.7%)
3/44
(6.8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 46/88
(52.3%)
23/44
(52.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 42/88
(47.7%)
19/44
(43.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/88
(20.5%)
10/44
(22.7%)
Clean Sheet 18/88
(20.5%)
10/44
(22.7%)
Failed to Score 29/88
(33%)
12/44
(27.3%)
Gillingham Gillingham Current Season
Metric All
(88 games)
Venue
(44 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 55/88
(62.5%)
30/44
(68.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/88
(22.7%)
9/44
(20.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 26/33
(78.8%)
11/14
(78.6%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 11/33
(33.3%)
5/14
(35.7%)
Winning at HT 18/88
(20.5%)
11/44
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/88
(5.7%)
5/44
(11.4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/88
(6.8%)
2/44
(4.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 38/88
(43.2%)
20/44
(45.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 30/88
(34.1%)
14/44
(31.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 12/88
(13.6%)
7/44
(15.9%)
Clean Sheet 30/88
(34.1%)
12/44
(27.3%)
Failed to Score 27/88
(30.7%)
15/44
(34.1%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Cheltenham play Gillingham?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 52% of Cheltenham's recent matches and 46% of Gillingham's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Cheltenham vs Gillingham usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 43% of Cheltenham's recent games and 32% of Gillingham's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Cheltenham and Gillingham tend to score early?

Cheltenham have had a goal before half-time in 66% of their recent matches, Gillingham in 68% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Cheltenham and Gillingham share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at EV Charger Points Stadium, Regular Season - 43, as Cheltenham and Gillingham drew 1-1 in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cheltenham 1.14 xG and Gillingham 1.07 xG, a combined 2.21. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cheltenham attack 0.85 / defence 1.19 against Gillingham attack 0.80 / defence 1.00, drawn from 42/88 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cheltenham 37% | Draw 30% | Gillingham 33%, with Cheltenham to win its most likely call at 37%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 30%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 38%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 65% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 45% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cheltenham 48%, Gillingham 34%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cheltenham's trading profile (88 games, 44 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did.

Gillingham's trading profile (88 games, 44 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 43% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cheltenham 1.10 PPG, Gillingham 1.30 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 38% Over 2.5 probability, 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 45% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 41% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.