Sign in Register

Cheltenham 0-1 AFC Wimbledon – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 3

Kick-off

Sat 24 Aug 2024

15:00

Venue

EV Charger Points Stadium

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Cheltenham at 47%, yet other data sources diverge — this Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a League Two clash, Regular Season - 3 as Cheltenham welcome AFC Wimbledon to EV Charger Points Stadium. Kick-off is set for Saturday 24 August 2024 at 15:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all League Two games this season, Cheltenham have gone 3W 0D 7L from 10 outings — a 0.90 PPG return. Last five: L W L W L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. Cheltenham have played only a handful of League Two games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Cheltenham at EV Charger Points Stadium this season: 4W 1D 5L from 10 home games — 1.30 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, AFC Wimbledon stand at 3W 2D 5L from 10 League Two matches — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L L W W L. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.60. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. AFC Wimbledon have played only a handful of League Two games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

AFC Wimbledon's away record: 1W 2D 7L from 10 road trips in League Two this season (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.50 is notably below their overall 1.10 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Cheltenham at 0.90 PPG versus AFC Wimbledon's 1.10. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 2 previous meetings, Cheltenham have won 1, AFC Wimbledon 0, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 2 meetings have averaged 4.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 19 Mar 2022, ended 3–1 with Cheltenham winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Cheltenham trading profile (48 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

AFC Wimbledon trading profile (48 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 46% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 70% of the time; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 33% of games (away games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Cheltenham 50% versus AFC Wimbledon 46%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Cheltenham 48% | AFC Wimbledon 38%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cheltenham 1.68 xG and AFC Wimbledon 1.26 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cheltenham attack 1.075 / defence 1.220 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.787 / defence 1.060. League average goals — home 1.471 / away 1.314. Data: 2 Cheltenham games / 48 AFC Wimbledon games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Cheltenham 47% | Draw 24% | AFC Wimbledon 29%. Fair-value odds: Cheltenham 2.13 | Draw 4.17 | AFC Wimbledon 3.45. Cheltenham hold a narrow Poisson edge at 47% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 2.94. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.94 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Cheltenham as the most likely outcome at 47% — moderate model lean. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Cheltenham offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.94 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 56% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 58% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Cheltenham 60% | AFC Wimbledon 40%.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (2 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (4.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.94) both back Over 2.5 goals (56% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 58% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Cheltenham Poisson xG (1.68) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.40) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form AFC Wimbledon Poisson xG (1.26) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.80) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.94 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Market Poisson model is blending current and prior-season data with limited current-season samples (2/48 games) — model confidence is moderate; treat probability edges as indicative rather than definitive.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon | Competition: League Two, Regular Season - 3 | Venue: EV Charger Points Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 24 Aug 2024, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Cheltenham 47% | Draw 24% | AFC Wimbledon 29% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 56% | BTTS 58% | xG Cheltenham 1.68 / AFC Wimbledon 1.26 • Poisson strength factors: Cheltenham attack 1.075 / def 1.220 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.787 / def 1.060 | league avg home 1.471 / away 1.314 • Poisson stance: Cheltenham (47%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.68

Cheltenham xG

Expected Goals

1.26

AFC Wimbledon xG

47%
24%
29%
Cheltenham Draw AFC Wimbledon

58%

BTTS

79%

Over 1.5

56%

Over 2.5

34%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon kick off?

Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 24 August 2024 at EV Charger Points Stadium.

What was the final score in Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Cheltenham 0 - 1 AFC Wimbledon.

Where is Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon being played?

The match is being played at EV Charger Points Stadium.

What competition is Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon part of?

Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon is a Regular Season - 3 fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our statistical model gives Cheltenham a 47% chance of winning, AFC Wimbledon a 29% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making Cheltenham the favourite.

Will both teams score in Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our model estimates a 58% probability that both Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon will score (BTTS).

Will Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 56%.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon?

Record (2 meetings): Cheltenham 1W | Draws 1 | AFC Wimbledon 0W.

What form are Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon in?

Cheltenham (all comps): 3W-0D-7L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.90 | L5 L-W-L-W-L. AFC Wimbledon (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.60 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-L-W-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates Cheltenham's attack at 1.07x the league average against AFC Wimbledon's defence at 1.06x — combine the two and it projects 1.68 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, AFC Wimbledon's attack versus Cheltenham's defence, projects 1.26 expected goals for the visitors.

The sample (2/48 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.7% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.4%), 2-0 (7.4%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Cheltenham Win

47%

Cheltenham

2.12

24%

Draw

4.16

29%

AFC Wimbledon

3.47

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.2%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.4%

Home win

1 – 0

8.9%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.68

Cheltenham xG

Total xG

2.94

1.26

AFC Wimbledon xG

47%
24%
29%
CheltenhamDrawAFC Wimbledon

2.12

47%

Home win

4.16

24%

Draw

3.47

29%

Away win

Goals Markets

79%

Over 1.5

1.27

21%

Under 1.5

4.76

56%

Over 2.5

1.79

44%

Under 2.5

2.27

34%

Over 3.5

2.94

66%

Under 3.5

1.52

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

58%

BTTS Yes

1.72

42%

BTTS No

2.40

Clean Sheet

28%

Cheltenham

3.53

19%

AFC Wimbledon

5.34

Win to Nil

13%

Cheltenham

7.49

5%

AFC Wimbledon

18.52

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.3 6.7 4.2 1.8 0.6 0.1
1 8.9 11.2 7.1 3.0 0.9 0.2
2 7.4 9.4 5.9 2.5 0.8 0.2
3 4.2 5.2 3.3 1.4 0.4 0.1
4 1.7 2.2 1.4 0.6 0.2
5 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.676
λ Away (xG) 1.261
Total xG 2.937
League avg home goals 1.471
League avg away goals 1.314
Cheltenham attack strength 1.075
Cheltenham defence strength 1.220
AFC Wimbledon attack strength 0.787
AFC Wimbledon defence strength 1.060
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 2 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.7%.

How many goals are Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon expected to score?

The model projects 1.68 expected goals for Cheltenham and 1.26 for AFC Wimbledon, a combined total of 2.94.

How confident is the prediction model for Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 47%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Cheltenham come into this having played 48 games, going 13W 8D 27L for 0.98 points per game. Their last five reads L-W-L-W-L. It's still early in the season for Cheltenham, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

On the other side, AFC Wimbledon sit at 1.42 PPG from 48 outings (18W 14D 16L), a run that reads L-L-W-W-L across their last five. It's still early in the season for AFC Wimbledon, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

AFC Wimbledon carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.44 PPG clear of Cheltenham — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Home Ground vs the Road

Cheltenham's home form reads 8W 4D 12L across 24 games on their own ground, a 1.17 PPG return.

Away from home, AFC Wimbledon have taken 1.08 points per game from 24 outings (6W 8D 10L).

The Goals Picture

Cheltenham are averaging 0.96 goals scored and 1.46 conceded per game recently; AFC Wimbledon are on 1.42 scored and 1.15 conceded.

Last 48 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Cheltenham

Cheltenham

Early Season
L W L W L
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

Early Season
L L W W L
48 Played 48
13/8/27 W / D / L 18/14/16
0.98 Points Per Game 1.42
0.96 Avg Goals Scored 1.42
1.46 Avg Goals Conceded 1.15
2.42 Avg Goals / Game 2.56
10 Clean Sheets 16
24 BTTS 22
23 Over 2.5 Games 18
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

L
A Grimsby
2–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
H Newport County
3–2 HT 2–2
10 Aug
L
A Stevenage
1–2 HT 0–1
27 Apr
W
H Peterborough
2–0 HT 2–0
23 Apr
L
H Lincoln
1–2 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Burton Albion
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Apr
L
H Bristol Rovers
1–3 HT 0–1
13 Apr
L
H Carlisle
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Apr
L
A Leyton Orient
1–3 HT 0–2
06 Apr
L
H Exeter City
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Apr
W
A Fleetwood Town
2–1 HT 1–0
29 Mar
D
A Barnsley
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Mar
L
A Oxford United
1–2 HT 0–1
09 Mar
L
H Charlton
1–3 HT 0–1
05 Mar
D
H Burton Albion
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Mar
L
A Wycombe
0–2 HT 0–0
27 Feb
D
A Wigan
1–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
W
H Port Vale
3–2 HT 1–1
17 Feb
W
H Blackpool
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Feb
W
A Cambridge United
1–0 HT 0–0
10 Feb
L
H Wycombe
1–3 HT 0–2
03 Feb
L
A Derby
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Jan
L
A Bolton
0–1 HT 0–1
23 Jan
W
H Portsmouth
2–1 HT 0–0
06 Jan
L
A Northampton
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Jan
D
H Reading
2–2 HT 2–2
29 Dec
W
H Shrewsbury
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Dec
W
A Carlisle
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Dec
L
H Leyton Orient
1–2 HT 0–0
16 Dec
D
A Bristol Rovers
1–1 HT 1–0
09 Dec
L
A Charlton
1–2 HT 1–1
28 Nov
W
H Oxford United
2–0 HT 1–0
25 Nov
D
H Wigan
1–1 HT 1–1
11 Nov
W
A Port Vale
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Oct
L
A Blackpool
2–3 HT 1–3
24 Oct
W
H Cambridge United
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Oct
D
H Derby
1–1 HT 1–1
07 Oct
L
H Fleetwood Town
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Oct
L
A Lincoln
0–2 HT 0–2
30 Sep
L
H Stevenage
0–3 HT 0–1
23 Sep
L
A Peterborough
0–3 HT 0–0
19 Sep
L
A Exeter City
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Sep
L
H Barnsley
0–2 HT 0–0
02 Sep
L
H Northampton
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Aug
D
A Portsmouth
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Aug
L
A Reading
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Aug
L
H Bolton
0–3 HT 0–3
12 Aug
L
A Shrewsbury
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Aug
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

L
A Bromley
0–2 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
H Colchester
4–2 HT 3–2
10 Aug
W
H Walsall
5–1 HT 2–1
27 Apr
L
A Tranmere
2–3 HT 0–2
20 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
2–3 HT 1–0
13 Apr
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
L
A Stockport County
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Apr
D
H Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
23 Mar
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Mar
W
H Gillingham
2–0 HT 1–0
12 Mar
W
A Notts County
2–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
D
H Grimsby
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Mar
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Mar
L
A Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
24 Feb
L
H Crawley Town
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Feb
D
H Morecambe
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Feb
L
A Accrington ST
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Feb
W
H Barrow
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Feb
D
A Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Feb
W
H Mansfield Town
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Jan
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–3 HT 0–3
23 Jan
L
A Wrexham
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Jan
D
A Forest Green
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Jan
W
H Colchester
5–3 HT 2–2
29 Dec
L
H Sutton Utd
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Dec
W
A Crawley Town
2–1 HT 2–0
22 Dec
D
A Salford City
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Dec
W
H Swindon Town
4–0 HT 1–0
09 Dec
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Nov
W
H Notts County
4–2 HT 2–0
25 Nov
W
H Doncaster
2–0 HT 1–0
11 Nov
L
A Morecambe
1–4 HT 0–0
28 Oct
L
H Accrington ST
2–4 HT 0–2
24 Oct
D
A Barrow
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Oct
L
H Bradford
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Oct
D
A Mansfield Town
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Oct
W
A Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 1–0
03 Oct
W
H Tranmere
4–1 HT 2–1
30 Sep
W
A Walsall
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
D
H Crewe
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Sep
L
H Stockport County
1–2 HT 1–0
09 Sep
D
A Newport County
2–2 HT 2–1
02 Sep
D
H Forest Green
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Sutton Utd
3–0 HT 0–0
19 Aug
W
A Colchester
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Aug
D
H Wrexham
1–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
D
A Grimsby
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon in coming into this match?

Cheltenham have gone 13W 8D 27L in their last 48 games (0.98 PPG), while AFC Wimbledon have gone 18W 14D 16L in their last 48 (1.42 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Cheltenham at home or AFC Wimbledon away?

Cheltenham's home record (1.17 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Cheltenham at home: 1.17 PPG; AFC Wimbledon away: 1.08 PPG.

Have Cheltenham or AFC Wimbledon been keeping clean sheets recently?

Cheltenham have kept a clean sheet in 21% of their recent games, AFC Wimbledon in 33%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon runs to 4 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to February 2022. The pairing has crossed competitions too — League One, League Two all feature in the head-to-head log. It has been a while since the last meeting — 11 March 2025, some 3 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Digging Into the Numbers

Cheltenham's record when hosting AFC Wimbledon specifically: 1W 0D 1L from 2 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 4 Meetings

Cheltenham

2

Cheltenham

1

Draws

AFC Wimbledon

1

AFC Wimbledon

Recent Meetings

AFC Wimbledon
1–2
11 Mar 25
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
0–1
24 Aug 24
AFC Wimbledon
Cheltenham
3–1
19 Mar 22
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
2–2
01 Feb 22
Cheltenham

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon?

From 4 meetings on record, Cheltenham have won 2, AFC Wimbledon have won 1, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon last play each other?

They last met on 11 March 2025, when AFC Wimbledon 1-2 Cheltenham.

Who has won more matches between Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon?

Cheltenham have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Cheltenham are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches.

AFC Wimbledon see a goal before the break in 46% of their matches.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Cheltenham 50%, AFC Wimbledon 38% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 50% (Cheltenham) and 33% (AFC Wimbledon).

On the defensive side: AFC Wimbledon in 38%; Cheltenham have failed to score in 29% of games; AFC Wimbledon in 46%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Cheltenham home games / AFC Wimbledon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Cheltenham Cheltenham Early Season
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 33/48
(68.8%)
18/24
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/48
(29.2%)
9/24
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/15
(80%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/15
(46.7%)
4/6
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 9/48
(18.8%)
5/24
(20.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/48
(4.2%)
0/24
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/48
(2.1%)
0/24
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/48
(50%)
12/24
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 23/48
(47.9%)
12/24
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 9/48
(18.8%)
6/24
(25%)
Clean Sheet 10/48
(20.8%)
6/24
(25%)
Failed to Score 17/48
(35.4%)
7/24
(29.2%)
AFC Wimbledon AFC Wimbledon Early Season
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 28/48
(58.3%)
11/24
(45.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/48
(29.2%)
6/24
(25%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 14/20
(70%)
8/13
(61.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/20
(35%)
6/13
(46.2%)
Winning at HT 17/48
(35.4%)
5/24
(20.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/48
(10.4%)
2/24
(8.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/48
(4.2%)
0/24
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/48
(45.8%)
9/24
(37.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 18/48
(37.5%)
8/24
(33.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/48
(29.2%)
6/24
(25%)
Clean Sheet 16/48
(33.3%)
9/24
(37.5%)
Failed to Score 16/48
(33.3%)
11/24
(45.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Cheltenham play AFC Wimbledon?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 50% of Cheltenham's recent matches and 38% of AFC Wimbledon's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Cheltenham vs AFC Wimbledon usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 50% of Cheltenham's recent games and 33% of AFC Wimbledon's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Cheltenham and AFC Wimbledon tend to score early?

Cheltenham have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, AFC Wimbledon in 46% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as AFC Wimbledon defy the odds to beat Cheltenham 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

AFC Wimbledon beat Cheltenham 0-1 at EV Charger Points Stadium, Regular Season - 3, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cheltenham 1.68 xG and AFC Wimbledon 1.26 xG, a combined 2.94. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Cheltenham fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cheltenham attack 1.07 / defence 1.22 against AFC Wimbledon attack 0.79 / defence 1.06, drawn from 2/48 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Cheltenham 47% | Draw 24% | AFC Wimbledon 29%, with Cheltenham to win its most likely call at 47%. The actual AFC Wimbledon win had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 79% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 43% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cheltenham 48%, AFC Wimbledon 38%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cheltenham's trading profile (48 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (48 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, AFC Wimbledon arrived the stronger side — 1.42 PPG against 0.98. Form held, and they took the win. Cheltenham (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.12 scoring average — below par going forward. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.17 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 56% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 58% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 43% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.