🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Bromley edge out Accrington ST 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Bromley beat Accrington ST 2-1 at Hayes Lane, Regular Season - 35, in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Bromley 1.30 xG and Accrington ST 1.06 xG, a combined 2.36. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Bromley attack 1.24 / defence 0.96 against Accrington ST attack 0.93 / defence 0.84, drawn from 79/79 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Bromley 42% | Draw 28% | Accrington ST 30%, with Bromley to win its most likely call at 42%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 42%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 68% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Bromley 49%, Accrington ST 43%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Bromley's trading profile (79 games, 39 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Accrington ST's trading profile (79 games, 39 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Bromley arrived the stronger side — 1.66 PPG against 1.22. That form edge translated into the three points.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights