🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Port Vale cruise to a comfortable 0-2 victory over AFC Wimbledon.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Port Vale beat AFC Wimbledon 0-2 at The Cherry Red Records Stadium, Regular Season - 45, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AFC Wimbledon 1.43 xG and Port Vale 0.85 xG, a combined 2.29. The scoreboard read 0-2 for 2 actual goals. AFC Wimbledon fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Port Vale outscored their 0.85 projection by 1.1. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AFC Wimbledon attack 0.97 / defence 0.71 against Port Vale attack 1.06 / defence 1.14, drawn from 90/44 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AFC Wimbledon 50% | Draw 28% | Port Vale 22%, with AFC Wimbledon to win its most likely call at 50%. Instead the game produced a Port Vale win, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 40%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 67% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 44% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AFC Wimbledon 36%, Port Vale 46%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 42%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (90 games, 45 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 40% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Port Vale's trading profile (90 games, 45 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — AFC Wimbledon 1.50 PPG, Port Vale 1.31 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Port Vale win broke the near-deadlock. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.69 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 2 against a 0.87 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Port Vale (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 0.96 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.51 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights