Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Shock result as Stockport County defy the odds to beat Huddersfield 1-0.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Stockport County beat Huddersfield 1-0 at Edgeley Park, Regular Season - 26, in the League One. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Stockport County 1.51 xG and Huddersfield 1.71 xG, a combined 3.22. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Huddersfield landed 1.7 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Stockport County attack 1.03 / defence 1.27 against Huddersfield attack 1.22 / defence 1.08, drawn from 70/71 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Stockport County 34% | Draw 23% | Huddersfield 43%, with Huddersfield to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual Stockport County win had been the model's second-ranked read at 34%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 83% and missed. Over 3.5 was 40% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 64% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Stockport County 46%, Huddersfield 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 54%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Stockport County's trading profile (71 games, 35 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one.
Huddersfield's trading profile (71 games, 35 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Stockport County 1.76 PPG, Huddersfield 1.45 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Stockport County win broke the near-deadlock. Stockport County (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.11 average — tighter than their form line. Huddersfield (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.40 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.